Thanks, Don and Claudio, for clearing up that issue.
In message <5678165a-342f-43f1-9a45-2d0669...@googlegroups.com>, Pete
Don, no reason why ASFK shouldn't work well. I would need a different setup tho. I want to keep the cursor on Notepad, operate a mechanical key, and work semi break-in, not break-in. Exactly as tho I was operating a Swan 500 if I had one.
That would mean a hardware connection to something, perhaps to PowerSDR, and a connection from the computer to the HL2. I can't use MOX in PowerSDR without changing the focus away from Notepad, and in a QSO that is cumbersome beyond tolerance.
Hi there. I need your help. I can't get a connection between rasperry pi and hermes lite 2.
Thanks for writing, Matthew, hope I can clear it up although I have a sense I'm being repetitive here. Understanding this is very simple - just read the last fifteen years of PowerSDR documentation and it will be obvious.
The UI to do with this simple operation hasn't changed, and the info is on the screens of the current mrX version. The issue is, is that apparently the current implementation on the HL2 doesn't work the way PowerSDR was designed, and I haven't found any documentation on what works and what doesn't. All other forks I've used implement what I'm concerned about.
The idea is that you connect a telegraph key of any description to PowerSDR via a serial port. PowerSDR has a built in memory keyer. When the key is depressed, that keyer puts the rig into transmit and activates its cw tone. As it's semi break-in, the rig stays in transmit for a settable time and generates a tone on subsequent key activations. The output of PowerSDR is a DTR or RTS line going high - this is supposed to be connected to the radio, but that's an implementation detail, but could be to the Ethernet port as well. As designed, one can use the same serial port to which to connect the key and the radio. All this has been written up many times and appears on many web pages.
Yes, connecting a key directly to the HL2 works but a) relays can't keep up with fast cw, b) relays click loudly, c) relays provide a form of break-in, not semi break-in, d) they're still not fast enough to hear activity between code elements, which is what break-in should be, e) PowerSDR flashes from receive to transmit annoyingly and pointlessly with each character element.
To answer your question, delay would vary from a second to maybe three seconds, not critical. As stated previously, I also would use CWX and other PowerSDR functions, but moving the focus from Notepad to PowerSDR is cumbersome. If PowerSDR would respond to a key input that would be avoided. I'm sure there are other programs and workarounds, but the reason we're having this conversation is primarily an issue of documentation.
Hope this is clear.
In message <a033df9d-a646-4174-a17e-f144a3...@googlegroups.com>, Pete
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hermes-lite+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit