DL1SIG
unread,Mar 23, 2023, 6:56:04 PM3/23/23Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Steve Haynal, herme...@googlegroups.com
Hi Steve, all,
after seeing the recent discussion about TX issues some users are facing
and the mention of checking/re-soldering the exposed pad connection, I
checked my board from the January 2023 batch. Note that I haven't yet
tested TX because I haven't had the time yet to properly mount it in the
case; receiving seems to work fine. So I just checked because I was
curious and, since it's not mounted yet, the board is still easy to
access.
Based on the published design files the following ICs have a hole under
their footprint to access the exposed pad and the pad should be
soldered: U2, U3, U4, U6, U7, U8, U9, U12, U16
On my board U2 has a clearly visible drop of solder on one side of it's
hole and the solder joint looks fine. On the inner edge of the hole of
U7 there was something that looked like flux residues. After cleaning it
with ethanol it's gone. On the edge of the hole I think I now see the
metal of the pad, in the center it has a black/dark-grey circle (Maybe
from soldering? Definitively looks not like the photo LY2SS posted here,
there everything looks like metal from the pad). Can't see any solder
joint.
On all other ICs I only see the IC (pad metal and, for some, part of the
plastic package) through the hole. No indication that anything has been
soldered.
Of course there might be still a solder connection below the package on
the part of the pad that aren't exposed by the hole.
So my questions are:
- Is my list above with ICs that should have their pad soldered
correct?
- Should there be a solder joint visible through the holes below the
ICs?
- If that's not the case (as described above), is it recommended to
solder them?
Thanks, Simon DL1SIG