Tablighi Nisab Pdf
Nickie Koskinen
I have great respect for Syed Maududi. I inquired the purpose
of this criticism and I came to know that the Muslim regimes who lick
the boots of George Bush are afraid of the world Jihad and the
Islamic Order and as such have appointed paid Ulemaa to attack and
spread misgivings of various sorts. I told them that we are passing through crucial period of
time and should find ways and means to talk to Shia friends and put
and effort to bring back qadianis back into fold of Islam. But instead
of making kafirs muslims these so called ulemaa are busy making kafirs
out of muslims. Do you have any idea how far this secterianism has spread
and how it is breaking the entire fabric of Muslim society? Give us
you suggestions for a balanced approach to solve this problem.
Secondly I have been waiting comments on the upcoming Book '
AlQuds and Ikhtetame Waqt' and was surprised to see none of you guys
has to say anything about it???? M Javed Iqbal
Only Allah SWT is Free from errors and mistakes. Our beloved prophet
has been Protected by Allahw SWT from making errors. All others are
subject to error. Allah SWT Hath Pardoned human errors of Sahaba Karam
as a reward of their sacrifices. But to probe in a particular
situation who acted more in line with Islamic Injunctions is an
Aalim's right and the earlier Ulemaa have been more harsh then Syed
Maududi.For your kind information Syed Maududi has been declared Mujaddid of
15the century. If you do not believe me, ask somebody who has
knowledge.M J Iqbal
You mis understood me. The fourth grader I referred to was
not you it was Ludhianvi marhoom. It is typical deobandi style of
arguing against the scholors of Quraan, being jelous of their
popularity and afraid of losing leadership to them. Forget about Syed
Maududi. Take the case of Dr Hamidudllah. That great scholor
translated Qruaan in Frechn and succeeded in converting 10000
Frenchmen to Islam. But they did not permit him to stay in Pakistan.
Dr Fazlurh Rahmn Ansari is not only a great scholor of Islam but was
a Wali. But deobandis again rose againt him. Even Dr Israr a good
scholor of Quraan has not been accepted by him. For them the hidayat
is confined to the Indian Madarsah of Deoband. But if you ask what the
rest of 1100 million muslims are doing as they do have access to
deoband. Are they good Muslims or not. They do not answer this
question. Remember, Sahaba is a general term. But the Quraan explains
that during the time our beloved prophet had graced the earth with his
presence, some people did not actually believed, some were hypocrites
and so on. Quraan very clearly mentions that those who started
believing in Islam after Fathe Makka are not as good as who laid down
their lives and fought many battles for the sake of Islam. Can you
equate Muawia with Hazrat Abu Bakar or Hazrat Umar or even with Syedna
Usman?. Only by looking at their deeds in the light of Quraan, we come
to know the value of their services. However Yousuf Ludhianvi
glorifies Amir Muawia, he failed to justify his usurption of power and
converting Khilafat to Mulookiat. We have a standard for finding
zalalah fro m hidaya. That was our beloved nabi during his lifetime
and now it is Quraan. Islam recognizes only one King and that is Allah
SWT. Anybody who tries to become a king is a
a tyrant and treacheror. Soverignity over the entire Universe Belongs
to Allah SWT. When Nabi Akram SAW, commanding so much love and
respect of Sahaba did not name a person to lead the ummah. how Muawiah
could do. I know for fact that Shias are lost and are gumrah. But that
does not mean that we shut our eyes from facts. Hazrat Ali inspite of
some differences served the Islamic cause during caliphate. He not
only provided support and advice to the government but during the time
of crisises fought for it. During the encirclement of Hazrat Usman's
house he made imam Hasan and Imam Husain stand guard at the doors of
Hazrat Usman. Where as shias have made a different firqa and are
hence misled.Even Shah Wali Ullah, another Mujaddid prior to Syed
Maududi preferred Hazrat Ali over HAzrat Usman and was of the view
that if he had succeeded Hazrat Umar, the circumstances would have
been much more favourable to Islam and Muslimeen. In short read holy Quran with full belief, read and believe sahi
ahadis also, but the history should be read critically in the light
of Quraan and Ahadis. Mullah Ludhianvi and people like him were
serving the tyrant ziaulhaq to dislocate Jammat from its stronghold of
Karachi and Hyederabad, by creating shia sunni differences. He became
utltimtely victim of the dispute. Fatebru ya uli al absar! M J Iqbal
If you consider sahaba equal or superior to Huzoor Nabi Karim,
then it is your problem. I wrote very clearly that Amir Muavia was
intrumental in establishing his own kingdom in palce of Kingdom of
Allah SWT established with great sacrifces by Nabi Akram SAW. If
anybody acts against small sunnats everybody blames him but Muavia
broke the Islami Shariat by spending money from public treasury to
promote the leadership of his tribe. The dismantling of khilafat ala
minjah nabuwat was due to greed of power by Amir Muvavia and his
companions. If you consider Ali Karram Allah Wajhu equal or less then
Muavia, then you are in serious trouble. I cannot consider the zaif
riwayat concocted by Yazidis after grabbing the kingdom to be of any
significance. Hazrat Ali was trained and educated by our beloved
prophet whereas Muavia was trained by Abu Sufyan who throught his life
fought against Islam and caused hardships to our beloved Nabi. Alhamdo Lillah my love for Nabi Karim is the result of my Love of
Allah SWT and those of sahaba because of the love of Nabi Akram SA.
But probably you love Huzoor because of sahaba and Allah Taala on
account of love of Huzoor. Therefore for you your din and for me my
din.M J Iqbal
On Jun 15, 11:26 pm, "syed baber" wrote:
> Assalamo alaikum
>
> Tauba Tauba Allah maaf karay. Kisi Sahabi ko Laanti Abdullah Bin Ubai say
> milana Madudi Sahab kay perokaaroon ka hi shaiwa hosakta hai. Jawed Sahab
> jab Huzoor (peace be upon him) nay Dua ki thee to aap ko maloom hona chahye
> kay Wahi aai thee kay is kay liye dua na ki jay Allah ki taraf say mana
> kardia gia tha , Sharam ka muqam hai kay is baat ko Hazrat Muawiya kay Haq
> may dua say milaya jaraha hai. Aaap laaker dikhain Jam-e-Tarmizi may kay
> Huzoor nay dua ki ho aur Mana kardia gia ho.Worna batain kay Jam-e-Tirmizi
> may jo dua ki hai wo aap ko naozubillah maqbool nazar nahin aarahi hai aur
> Madoodi Sahab ki baat zada achi lagrahi hai. Aur Masha Allah farmatay hain
> kay sub ki hidayat kay liye dua ki Jaweb Sahab ye to Speciallay Hazrat
> Muawiya ka naam layker unkay samnay unkay liye Huzoor (peace be upon him)
> Dua farmarahay hain. Kia ye Sharf her kisi ko Hasil hogaya tha. Ager koi
> Madudi Sahab ki burai karay to aap ko bura lagta hai lekin koi Hazrat Ameer
> hai Masha Allah farmayay kia ye insaaf hai kay Aik Sahabi Rasool ki burai to
> aap ko manzoor hai lekin madoodi sahab ki khamiyaan aap mannay kay liye
> tayyar nahin hain.
>
> Aik baat clear kardoon kay Ahl-e-Sunnat Jamaat ka point of view ye hai kay
> hum Sahabi ko Masoom nahin samajhtay sirf Anbia hi Masoon hotay hain. Sahabi
> say ghalti hosakti hai lekin un ghaltioon ko biyan karkay unki Fazeelat ka
> inkar karna sarasar gumrahi hai aur kuch nahin. Shia bhee to Hazrat Abu
> tarah ki ghaltiyaan biyan karta hai uskay baray may aap kia kehtay hain.
> Yaqeenan Shia ye karkay Gumrah aur Mulhid-o-Zindeeq hi thera na.
>
> Aik baat aur clear kardoon kay maynay kahin bhee apni post may yazeed ki
> himayat nahin ki hai na hi maynay yazeed ka koi zikr kia hai Yazeed koi
> Sahabi nahin tha. Hazrat Hussain 100% Haq per thay aur Hazrat Hussain
> Nojawanan-e-Jannat kay Sardar hain.Yazeed ka amal Qabil-e-Malamat
>
> Aakhri baat jo aapnay Hazrat Ameer Muawiya per ilzaam lagaya hai kay ,
>
> "Amire muavia used the funds of baitulmal to win support of tribes".
>
> Aap is baat ka authentic reference dain aur Riwayat ka Zaeef na hona bhee
> Sabit karain, Aik aik rawi ka naam batain otherwise apna ye ilzam wapis
> lain aur Tauba karain. I am waiting for ur complete reference. Maynay aap ko
> Siha-e-Sitta may say Hazrat Muawiya kay Haq may Hadith dikhai hai. Kia aap
> mujhe Siha-e-Sitta may Hazrat Muawiya ki Tanqeed may Hadith Dikhasaktay
> hain.
>
> Allah Hafiz.
>
I wonder how followers of Moududi sahab would make themselves
different than shias who also criticize Muwaiya(RA) all the time and
they made several attempts to express anger by making a tunnel to his
shrine and urinate it.
The fact is all sahabas are sahabas. which sahaba is big and which is
not, The Prophet(saw) didn't give us permission to talk about it. What
we were told to follow them and I provided the hadith regarding
sahabas. I wonder what Modudi sahab got after criticizing sahabas?
Were he trying to say that He is more smarter than sahabis? If that
was his aim then I can say that he utterly got failed. If Modudi
offended Sahabis and Rasool than in current times, Ghamidi does same
with Hazrat Omar(RA),AYesha(RA) and Abu Huraira(RA). No Wonder
Prophecy of Rasool(SAW) that people would interpret things according
to their own will in ending times is getting fulfilled.
As I said, I have read Modudi and I can say that he has abused not
onyl sahabas but prophets as well. The way he addressed sahabis and
Rasoools IS offensive. Nobody can deny that because modudi's work is
proof against himself so I don't need some 3rd party to convince about
him. as far as his status of Mujadid and you said "Allah" did that. I
wonder did Allah send Wahi to Jamat-e-Islami about his mujaddid
status? I think its very immature statment. Since my family itself has
few outsiders from Jamat Islami so I often heard such "Holy" words for
Modudi sahab.Since I myself has a blog ( )- I would sure
upload work of Modudi sahab and will leave upto readers to decide that
how writer of such offensive work could be called a Islamic
scholar,leave the status of MUJADDID.-adnan