Rise
Of The Genetically Modified Mutant Freaks
At first glance, the creation of a chicken
that glows in the dark seems a disturbing and
unnecessary one. With a jellyfish gene
inserted into its DNA, a hen modified this way
acquires the power to fluoresce in a bright
green hue when illuminated with blue light –
an unsettling ability, to say the least. After
all, who needs poultry that can shine a light
on itself? More important, why go to the
trouble of mixing the DNA of two such
dissimilar creatures in the first place? It is
an important question that has recently been
reflected in headlines that followed the
release of Home Office figures which show
there was a dramatic rise in the creation of
genetically modified animals in laboratories
in 2009. In total, 1.5m experiments on GM
animals were carried out, a rise of 143,000
from the previous year. At the same time,
there was a corresponding decrease in
experiments on "natural" animals. In
other words, more and more scientists are now
relying on the use of GM animals, as opposed
to unmodified ones, for their research. But
what gives the insertion of a piece of DNA
from one living being into another such an
advantage for scientists? After all, inserting
invertebrate genes into mammals, and vice
versa, is not easy. It also makes the public
uncomfortable and raises the hackles of animal
rights organisations. Yet it has become the
standard route for researchers. Why?