First,
Hack The Planet, Then Let's See What Happens
Geoengineering would also kick in
quickly—though you’d have to keep putting
the stuff up there if you wanted to keep
having the climate payoff. It wouldn’t,
Keith emphasizes, solve all the problems of
climate change. For instance, a planetary
cooling would not do anything to counteract
the ongoing ocean acidification that is being
driven by our carbon emissions. Geoengineering
doesn’t make those emissions go away, it
just makes the planet chill down a little.
Most of all, we don’t really know the full
range of possible side effects—the
unintended consequences. And we won’t before
we use it. But if we’re in a climate corner,
we might just go ahead anyway. We might think
geoengineering is the best of our bad options.
The presentations by Leinen and Keith launched
a broad ranging discussion, but sitting in the
room, there was a fundamental theme I
couldn’t stop thinking of—the incredible
gap between the importance of geoengineering
as a possibility on the one hand, and the
complete lack of public awareness that it’s
even on the table on the other.