for liability reasons, I think posting AS HSL needs to be limited to things 
approved by the people who would be liable for the contents of the posts (i.e. 
the board, as we are the only people legally on the hook)
But we should have a way for many people to post on the HSL social media 
channels with their own bylines.
We also need to have ways for people to post across many different platforms.
There are some things (schedule reminders, announcements, etc) that should be 
posted AS HSL and can be automated.
We can have some other things (what happened last week with pictures) that can 
be posted AS HSL with curation
We need to make any approval process for posting AS HSL be simple and fast (not 
neccessarily limited to the board, but limited to people appointed by the board 
as the board is the ones with the personal liability)
but if we can find ways for people to post on the HSL channels in ways that make 
it clear that they are not officially speaking for HSL, that can be done with 
little or no approval (but we will need a policy about what does and doesn't get 
posted, and how to deal with people who violate the policy)
I come from a security/audit background, I am pretty close to non-existant on 
social media, so I may be overly paranoid about the liability aspect, This is my 
opionin, not the opinion of anyone else.so if you disagree, speak up, tell me 
how I am misunderstanding the situation, or anything else.
David Lang
On Sun, 19 Oct 2025, Brett Brett wrote:
> Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2025 14:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Brett Brett <
brett...@heatsynclabs.org>
> Reply-To: 
heatsy...@googlegroups.com
> To: HeatSync Labs <
heatsy...@googlegroups.com>
> Subject: [HSL] [CFP] Social Media/Comms Policy
> 
> It has come to the board's attention that we are lacking an official policy
> on the use of our social media accounts. As a board, we're legally
> responsible for protecting the lab's assets, including our social media
> accounts. We want to delegate access without creating unnecessary barriers,
> but we're not sure what that should look like in practice—and we don't want
> to shoulder all the work ourselves! Since this affects everyone, we don't
> think it's right to decide by ourselves. So, we'd like to hear from the
> community. Some ideas so far include:
>
>   - Only the board should have access to our social media
>   - Every card member should have admin access to all of our social media
>   - We should encourage members to tag HSL in social media and simply
>   repost, or use automated systems to post
>   - We should form an Events/Communication/Social Media committee and only
>   they should have access to our social media
>      - How, then, are members of this committee picked? By the board? By