Fwd: Why people believe conspiracy theories

2 views
Skip to first unread message

John Nissen

unread,
Mar 17, 2026, 7:14:46 AMMar 17
to Thomas Goreau, Peter Wadhams, Douglas Grandt, Herb, Planetary Restoration, healthy-planet-action-coalition
Hi Tom,

As a reader of The Bulletin, you may have read this issue.  I was particularly interested to read about Fukushima from a researcher [1] since I had inside knowledge from somebody who had lived near there and said that the nuclear fall-out danger was covered up, right from the start.  Children were allowed to play outside at school, despite parents' concerns.  Thousands of children then got problems with thyroid glands, which the researcher didn't pick up on.  

I followed the clear-up operation, in which hundreds if not thousands of workers were involved, each for a short time because of exposure to radiation.  The operations were extremely risky, because a single mistake could have meant meltdown.  There was just one person who was writing about all the hazards; the authorities were silent.  They were also silent about the huge plume of radioactive material released from settling tanks into the Pacific Ocean, which affected fish and fishermen.

This was a classic case of cover up.  We have another case of cover up with the scientists who advocate for the Emissions Reduction Alone strategy: it is doomed to failure.  Ideally this fact should be exposed in The Bulletin.  What chance?  Instead the need for SRM is treated as a kind of conspiracy theory: conspiring against the ERA strategy, e.g. with the moral hazard argument.  

Needless to say, Trump has fallen for this conspiracy theory, raised by one of his side-kicks, and is trying to ban work on SRM I believe.  Will the Democrats rise to the occasion, if they take over after Trump?  Is there any sign that they recognise the urgent need for SRM and are working on SRM deployment behind the scenes?

Cheers, John

[1] Maxime Polleri
Counting the dead at Fukushima


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists <newsl...@thebulletin.org>
Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 1:19 PM
Subject: Why people believe conspiracy theories
To: <johnnis...@gmail.com>


US nuclear arsenal | Social media for AI | More
 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Read a shareable version of this newsletter in your browser.

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

It is 85 seconds to midnight.

Presented in partnership with

Uppsala Universitet

March 16, 2025

The B-21 Raider stealth strategic bomber in a hangar at Plant 42 in Palmdale, California. A white, unusually shaped aircraft with a the front in a wide point and a curved back. It sits in a grey concrete hanger with a large US flag behind it.

The B-21 Raider stealth strategic bomber in a hangar at Plant 42 in Palmdale, California. The conversion of the non-nuclear B-1 host bases to receive the nuclear B-21 bomber will increase the overall number of bomber bases with nuclear weapons storage facilities from two bases today (Minot AFB and Whiteman AFB) to five bases by the 2030s. (Photo: US Air Force)

United States nuclear weapons, 2026

"In this issue of the Nuclear Notebook, we estimate that the United States maintains a stockpile of approximately 3700 warheads," write Hans M. Kristensen, Matt Korda, Eliana Johns, and Mackenzie Knight-Boyle. The latest Notebook takes a look at the US nuclear arsenal amidst a wide-ranging nuclear modernization program. Read more.

The war on Iran will speed the transition away from fossil fuels and toward nuclear energy, creating strategic challenges for the United States

"There are at least three key drivers of the nuclear renaissance: political volatility; the need for energy-intensive data centers to power AI's future; and increasing energy demands in emerging, often energy-poor economies," writes Rachel Bronson. Read more.

Does Macron's nuclear upgrade mark the end of France's 'strict sufficiency' principle?

Despite the increase, the underlying spirit of strict sufficiency—maintaining only what is necessary to protect France's vital interests—remains present in Macron's speech, writes Astrid Chevreuil. Read more.

AI social platforms like Moltbook are potential accelerators of existential risk that should be regulated as critical infrastructure

"AI social networks are not merely places where AIs interact," writes Roman V. Yampolskiy. "They are environments in which agents can compound their capabilities and coordinate at scale—and environments in which humans can lose control." Read more.


Advertisement

AMC Multidisciplinary Conference. 9-10 June 2026, Uppsala, Sweden: Registration Open.

Why people believe conspiracy theories: A political scientist's view

Political scientist Joseph Uscinski talks to Bulletin contributing editor Dawn Stover about conspiracy theories and the people who believe them. Uscinski's research has found that conspiracy theories are not new, nor are they more prevalent than in the past. What has changed, he says, is that people at the highest echelons of power in the United States are embracing conspiracy theories, and conspiracy-mindedness is becoming more concentrated in one political party than in the past. This Bulletin magazine article is available to all readers for a limited time.

UPCOMING EVENT

The Third Nuclear Age: Will our luck finally run out?

This Wednesday, March 18, the MIT Security Studies Program will host Bulletin president and CEO Alexandra Bell for a discussion on recent developments in nuclear proliferation, arms control, and strategy. It will begin at 11:00 a.m. CDT / 12:00 p.m. EDT. Watch the livestream here.

JOB POSTING

Looking for: Assistant Director of Digital Platforms

The Bulletin is seeking a strategic and technical leader to oversee our digital ecosystem and advance our mission. Read more and apply here.

Recent articles

QUOTE OF THE DAY


“In terms of health, it will cause generational harm, which always makes me tear up. The harm that's going to come to people that don't even know what CDC was protecting them from."


— Sarah Boim, former employee of the National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, "After firings, funding cuts, and a shooting, can a demoralized CDC workforce recover?", NPR

PRESENTED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH

Uppsala Universitet

AMC Conference 2026 – Registration Open

The Alva Myrdal Centre Multidisciplinary Conference, on 9–10 June in Uppsala and online, gathers researchers and practitioners interested in nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation and arms control.


Learn more.


Your gift fuels our mission to educate and empower. Together we will work to ensure science serves humanity.

Give today

Facebook Linkedin Youtube Instagram Tt Bluesky

Copyright © 2026 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists


All Rights Reserved | Email: newsl...@thebulletin.org


Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
1307 East 60th Street
Chicago, Illinois 60637
United States


Don't miss an email! Please add newsl...@thebulletin.org to your address book.


Share this email with a friend

Manage your email preferences | Unsubscribe from this list


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages