Computer Game Hugo

[Nerio Cintron]

SoI have Hugo set up on my computer and a local version of my site installed which I can view through localhost. I also have the site being hosted through github and deploy local versions through a deploy.sh (from the Hugo site) command.

I am getting a new computer and I am unsure how to reconnect to github. As a test I created a virtual machine on my current computer, installed Hugo, copied my local files across and know that I can view the site through local host. However, the deploy.sh does not obviously work.

Hi, just thought I would give an update on transferring my local Hugo site to a new computer and re-establishing the connection with GitHub. It might be of use to someone else or someone might be able to tell me if there is a quicker/cleaner way to complete the task. To recap, I have a local Hugo site on my computer which pushes changes to GitHub using the Hugo deploy.sh script found here. The steps I went through:

Hi, I have my hugo website stored on gitlab. I have a new computer I need to sync to the repo. What are the steps I need to do to be able to update this website again? How does the directory structure of this need to be can I just download the repo and put that folder anywhere? Does it have to be inside of some Hugo folder?

Long story short, I recently uninstalled the Chord Hugo 2 driver from my computer completely, the improvement of the sound quality is day and night, plus no more noise issue that I had before with the higher sample rate. So if you are not satisfied with the sound quality or experiencing noise/crackling sound issue with your Hugo 2 via USB connection before, give this solution a try.

I thought so too before, until when I set up a new PC during the weekend and I decided to try without the Chord driver, I was shocked how good it sounds, just to compare, I installed the Chord driver on my new PC after, but it sounds like a downgrade to me, and the worst part of the Chord driver is the strange white noise/crackling sound when play with high sample rate sound tracks.

This is a very detailed guide to install the Hugo framework for building websites through the wowchemy template on your local computer with Windows operating system. If you plan to host your website on Github, you should refer to the guide here. If you are using MacOS, this guide may also be relevant although you may need to change some commands. If you are using Linux, this guide is not for you.

My first website was built with Frontpage when I started my PhD study at HKUST in 1998. I moved the website from HKUST to SMU when I started my academia career in 2003. Since 2017, I started to explore to incorporate data science knowledge into accounting curriculum and have led the efforts in launching the first accounting Masters' degree in Accounting Data & Analytics. Since then, I started to use R for teaching and research, and also gradually move to Python. My goal is to eventually become bilingual in both R and Python. In the learning process, I read a lot of blogs on data sciences and noted that many blogs are using very interactive template, especially suitable for incorporating R or Python code in the web pages. As I am also using RMarkdown to prepare course materials including slides and assignment, I have the intention to publish some to share with the public.

My old website is hosting through the university server and I have a webdrive within my university network which enables me easily change the content of the webpage. So what I want is to modify the webpages and then copy them directly to the webdrive of my university server. So I need to install the Hugo framework on my local computer. Once again, if you want to host it through Github, you can stop here and refer to the guide here.

The Academic Template has four configuration files which contain important settings for your site. You can edit the files through your RStuido directly. It will take some time to figure out which is what.

Note that although we have copied config.yaml to the root folder, we need to modify the file under the config/_default/ folder. Any changes to the root folder file does not change the setting of your site.

When you are done with your editing, you may start to generate the pages which can be deployed to any website hosting site. Just type hugo command in the PowerShell terminal. You may press Ctrl + C to halt the hugo server and back to the command line.

After running the hugo command, it will automatically generate a public folder which contains all the files to be deployed to the host site. Just copy or transfer all the files under the public folder to your hosting site. For my case, I am using my university hosting site and I just copy all files under public folder to my web drive which is the hosting site provided by my university. Then you may use your hosting site address such as to view your web site. However, it seems it does not show the homepage properly as shown below.

I have finally decided to add this existing repository/Rproject to Github. It is fairly easy by following the github docs. To use gh command, you need to install Github CLI first. You may do so using conda install gh --channel conda-forge.

When I tried to launch the server through either hugo or blogdown, it says Error: from config: failed to resolve output format "WebAppManifest" from site config. I found the solution here. However I could not find any temp directory. Here is my solution:

If they have all these computerised sensors, and they have a computer capableof converting information into voice, why do they need technicians constantlyinteracting with each terminal to read information out to the team and to thecaptain?

The first thing that comes mind is how AI assistants work today. They can spitout a lot of suggestions and ideas, but many (most?) are (still?) plainly wrongor useless, so their output need to be reviewed by a human. Specifically, by aspecialist in the field. Even for highly sophisticated AIs and computers, Isuspect this would remain the case.

This kind of fits into the workflow seen on this sci-fi show (and others too).The operator gets an indicator that the computer found something, but needs tointeract for a bit and then confirms the computers findings before reportingthese to their team.

Such an interface would also need specialists/technicians working theseterminals. It fits the workflow of this sci-fi show, but also seems to fitwhere this kind of technology is headed. Running a survey where the data readby sensors is too many for a human to analyse entirely would work quite wellthis this approach: an AI points out all the oddities or potential findings ofinterest, but the specialist does the final review/audit before reporting thethe result to their team.

Other than the fact that it is its own piece of hardware, does the Hugo M-Scaler do anything more than what HQPlayer does when running on a standalone computer (assuming you set its outputs to match those of the M-Scaler)? If I remember correctly, you don't use upscaling in your reference system, but it would be interesting to compare hardware vs software solutions. My guess is that the purpose designed hardware of the Hugo has some noise benefits, but the software solutions is far more easily upgradeable on a continuous basis.

Foundation: Stillpoints Ultra, Shunyata Denali v1 and Typhon x1 power conditioners, Shunyata Delta v2 and QSA Lanedri Gamma Revelation and Infinity power cords, QSA Lanedri Gamma Revelation XLR interconnect, Shunyata Sigma Ethernet, MIT Matrix HD 60 speaker cables, GIK bass traps, ASC Isothermal tube traps, Stillpoints Aperture panels, Quadraspire SVT rack, PGGB 256

This has been discussed by Rob Watts (Chord's digital designer) over at the head-fi forum where he claimed that his hardware solution cannot be equaled in software like HQPlayer. As you'd expect HQPlayer's designer (Miska here) claimed otherwise, that their solution implemented on a suitably powered PC can actually exceed the performance provided by Chord's HW solution. That's a somewhat simplified view of their relative positions from my recollection. Guess it's up to each listener to decide which is best in a given system for themselves as the ultimate test.

This is a model of what a review should do. It is extremely well written, entertaining, and contains a ton of information and comparisons for people who are making decisions about the best use of their money. I'm happy you've found a great combo, Rajiv. I'm expecting my HMS to arrive in about a week. Your review certainly whets the appetite. Kudos!

Congrats on wrapping up your first set of featured articles. Technically I saw this as a success. You set a $5K budget for a DAC and you stuck to it. Then you gave your readers an unexpected wildcard bonus $5K. A perfect 10 that will go to at least 11!

@austinpop Wow, that must have taken some huge effort to do all the comparing and then to compile it into a well thought through and coherent write up. Especially as you included so many side issues and factors in your review. Well done!

The TT2 and MScaler combination is indeed stunning but the Dave combined with the MScaler takes the Mscaler to a completely different level of transparency and accuracy. But for anyone interested, do not try the Dave if you have no intention of buying it because once you have eaten the fruit it is difficult to go back to anything else.

Thanks for your comments about the WAVE Storm Reference cables which I make. You and others might like to know that the family has expanded to the STREAM and STONE ranges which are considerably more affordable but still exhibit the same RF noise filtering characteristics of the Storm cables.

3a8082e126