Why Boycott Whole Foods?
by Mike Hersh
John Mackey, CEO and co-founder of Whole Foods wrote an op-ed in the
Wall Street Journal on 8/12/2009 quoting Margaret Thatcher and
suggesting that all we have to do to fix the health care crisis is eat
healthy and let insurance companies do whatever they want. No health
reform needed. From the beginning, Mr. Mackey's Op-Ed was insulting and
over-simplistic. It led off with this quotation: "The problem with
socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money,"
attributed to Margaret Thatcher. This is ironic, because Thatcher
undermined the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom by
slashing funding for it. She also sought to impose poll taxes--charging
people to vote--to suppress voting by poor and working people! Her
misguided rightwing policies were so unpopular, she was about to lose
her job as Prime Minister when she stumbled into a conflict with
Argentina over some tiny islands and rallied nationalistic fervor. see
:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html
Of course throwing around labels like "socialism" begs the question. If
Mr. Mackey and like-minded opponents of health reform think modern
government is socialism, then why aren't they fighting to abolish
Medicare, or Social Security for that matter? They can't because it's
political suicide, but Republican icon Ronald Reagan argued that
Medicare would lead to tyranny. If successful, this boycott will mean
Mr. Mr. Mackey cannot use "other people's money," namely our money to
promote his extreme philosophy. Mr.Mackey also strongly opposes unions,
and forced his employees into a high-deductible, low cost (to Whole
Foods) health insurance plan. These actions reveal his real intentions
for the rest of us. He's free to do that, but we're free to avoid
enriching him and supporting his right wing ideology.
It gets worse. Mr. Mackey contributed money (again, earned from our
pockets) to Tom DeLay's campaigns and legal defense fund. DeLay--before
he became a "Dancing with the Stars" dancer--waged war against
progress, and resigned under indictment for several crimes. These days,
DeLay regularly attacks health reform as government interference in
families' health decisions. Sadly this principle didn't stop Mr. DeLay
from overriding the final wishes of Terri Schiavo or her husband
Michael, and involving the Congress directly in their family's health
decisions. By backing Tom DeLay's hypocrisy with his money, Mr. Mackey
has forfeited his chance to grab any more of my money. Whole Foods
should fire Mr. Mackey, and respect their customers. Until then, we
should stay away from Whole Foods.
John Mr. Mackey is entitled to his libertarian views, but we're
entitled not to support these views with our grocery dollars.
Libertarianism is an extreme point of view that opposes any government
role in protecting civil rights, ameliorating poverty, preventing
disease, maintaining roads or bridges. No child labor laws. No pure
food and drug laws. No public education. No workplace or environmental
protection. Just prisons, police, and the military. I believe most
people behave responsibly most of the time, but those who don't
endanger the rest. That's why we have speed limits and traffic lights.
To prevent chaos and mayhem. Before labor laws, bosses locked their
employees into sweatshops and paid them pennies per day. We saw what
happened before the EPA: rivers caught fire and big cities were
shrouded in smog.
If that's too long ago, consider the Bush Administration's bright idea
of putting Wall Street swindlers on the honor system and watching as
the whole economy collapsed. Former Fed Chairman Alan
Greenspan--another libertarian--admitted he "made a mistake" by putting
too much faith in "free markets." Chagrined by the catastrophe on his
watch, Mr. Greenspan admitted there is "a flaw in the model ... that
defines how the world works" and "a critical pillar to market
competition and free markets did break down ... I still do not fully
understand why it happened."
Well I understand why it happened. You can't rely on the honor system.
Apparently Mr. Mackey hasn't learned this lesson. He thinks we should
put health insurance companies on the same honor system that Wall
Street swindlers abused. The threadbare, minimalist government
libertarians advocate worked while the U.S. was a rural, agricultural
nation, but modern life requires modern government. To prevent
swindlers and predators from exploiting the rest of us, and to
facilitate basic survivable behavior. Almost everyone accepts this.
Libertarians refuse to face these facts, Mr. Mackey among them.
Once again, he's free to pontificate any way he wants, but not on my
dime. If you care about progress, don't let him do it on your dime
either.
But...but...but....
What happens to innocent employees injured by a boycott? People
will shop elsewhere, and those places will hire more employees. A
boycott isn't going to put Whole Foods out of business, but every
boycott entails risks of economic consequences for employees. What
happened to the employees of the Montgomery Bus system when Rosa Parks'
refusal to give up her seat sparked a boycott? I'm not sure, but do we
regret that boycott? In any case, we hope Whole Foods will fire Mr.
Mackey, quickly and get a CEO who is more tolerant if not supportive of
progress.
What about freedom of speech and toleration? There's no threat
to free speech here. No one is asking the government to muzzle anyone.
No one is demanding the Wall Street Journal shut down, and no one is
telling Mr. Mackey he cannot express himself--even express his own
intolerance. As Mr. Mackey himself wrote in his Op-Ed, "every American
adult is responsible for his or her own health." I don't believe that
we're all islands, and should be left to fend for ourselves, but I am
holding him responsible for his own words. As for tolerance, unlike
Republican opponents of needed health reform, we're not showing up and
screaming at people or disrupting discussions. We're just making our
arguments. Mr. Mackey's fellow libertarian John Stossel of ABC News'
"20/20" said, "Perhaps what the 'natural' food nuts really hate is that
Mr. Mackey is rich. They don't like profit." Why should we support
someone whose defender thinks we're "nuts?" Mr. Stossel's
reductio
ad ridiculum argument is typical of simplistic "debate," and in
that regard not much different from the disingenuous Op-Ed Mr. Mackey
wrote for the Wall Street Journal in the first place.
Didn't Mr. Mackey actually try to offer constructive suggestions?
Actually no. His suggestions range from self-serving (such as shop at
his stores) to deceptive. I agree with eating healthy, but that's no
answer for millions of Americans who can't get insurance or can't get
their insurance to pay for needed care. The suggestion that "tort
reform" will help lower health insurance costs is repudiated by every
experience or study--pure propaganda like the rest of Mr. Mackey's
"solutions." What is really bloating health care costs? Let's stick to
the facts. For example, the CEOs of big insurance companies pay
themselves nearly a million dollars a month! Rather than face up to
this root cause of the health care crisis--greed and abuse of insurance
executives--Mr. Mackey tries to mislead us. From his Op-Ed: "830,000
Canadians are currently waiting to be admitted to a hospital or to get
treatment, according to a report last month in Investor's Business
Daily." Wow! that sounds pretty scary! What he doesn't tell us is how
long they have to wait. A day? A week? We can't tell from this Op-Ed.
We do know that the situation in the U.S. is much worse. And that
Canadians overwhelmingly support their health system. And that the
"ObamaCare" under attack is not a clone of the Canadian system anyway.
We also know that Investor's Business Daily is a far right publication,
hardly an unbiased source. But for the sake of argument, let's accept
that scary number, 830,000 and multiply it by 60. That would barely
approach the nearly 50 million Americans who have no health coverage at
all, and can't even get in line to wait for treatment! Then, add the
nearly equal number of under-insured who also cannot get the care they
need. And add the millions more who have insurance, but due to high
deductibles and lifetime limits, end up bankrupt when they or their
family-member gets sick. The American Journal of Medicine reported that
62% of bankruptcy in America was caused by medical bills--and 75% of
those families had health insurance. Meanwhile, health insurance
company profits are sky-rocketing. They're making more money year after
year by increasing premiums, raising copays and deductibles, and
denying coverage. How do they get away with it? We have no choice.
Thanks to a federal law called ERISA they're exempt from laws that
promote competition in other industries. No wonder they're pulling out
all stops to prevent any meaningful healthcare reform. This is
happening now, and puts the lie to Mr. Mackey's claims that letting
insurance companies do whatever they want would make things better for
the American people.
To paraphrase Mr. Reagan, health insurance companies aren't the
solution, they're the problem. We don't need libertarian Republican
rhetoric about "empowering" individuals--which is just fancy talk for
letting corporations do whatever they want including monopolize
markets, exploit employees and bamboozle consumers. We need real health
reform. Preferably single payer a.k.a expanded, improved Medicare for
All. Anyone who opposes that should explain why they're not also
opposing Medicare for our seniors--and if they're in Congress they
should explain why "gubmint run healthcare" is good enough for them and
their family. Back to Mr. Mackey and his efforts to trick people into
accepting second-class health care or no care at all, his union-busting
and arcane notions of what we need from government: Until Whole Foods
fires him we should spend our money elsewhere. Boycott Whole Foods, and
call or visit your local Whole Foods store to tell the manager about
it. Also inform the Whole Foods's World HQ:
Whole Foods Market, Inc.
550 Bowie Street
Austin, TX 78703-4644
512.477.4455
512.477.5566 voicemail
512.482.7000 fax