Hi Daiki -
I'm sorry it's confusing. What I suggested to the community yesterday is that they get their lawyer to draw up a purchase and sale agreement that has both you and the Homeowners Association as the buyer, and me as the seller. That way, they are exercising their option and simultaneously transferring it to you. I don't know if they (or their lawyer) likes this idea. They haven't responded to that suggestion yet.
The community has the purchase option to buy my house through April 6th. That means that they would actually buy my house and then sell it to you, but since without you as a buyer they don't have the money to do it, I thought doing it as one transaction with both of you named might work.
None of us has ever worked through this before, so we're all a bit in the dark. I never imagined I'd be the first one through this particular gate. So bear with us, I'm sure it will work out. They have complained that their lawyer is not very responsive, so it might take a little time for them to get an answer about how they want to proceed.
Buying my house is different, too, than buying Headwaters. One thing I didn't mention yesterday is that depending on how they go about buying my shares, you are probably going to buy your share of Headwaters as you buy the house. While they have the option, this means that the cost of the house for you would be the appraised value, which is $242,000, plus your full share of the common land and facilities, which will depend on our negotiations, but it is somewhere between $3,130 and $5,125 (in addition to the cost of the house).
One of the sticking points in our negotiations is the electric problem I mentioned before. The higher figure ($5,125) for the full share includes a $15,000 set-aside I am requiring to make sure you have the money to connect to the grid through site #3 for backup power, since Oliver doesn't want the backup power to go through his house anymore. It's an expensive problem and since it is infrastructure that will stay in the ground there (and since I had already paid to do it another way), it will be a cost for Headwaters, since Headwaters has put in all the infrastructure, and that makes the price for the shares higher.
There are other options besides hooking up to site #3, as I mentioned before. You could just use a generator for the long low sun periods. You could get a couple new panels and need the generator less. The new batteries mean that we've only needed the backup power every three days overnight in the summer, somewhat more often in the winter, but it's not much. Oliver could upgrade the cable to his house so the electricity isn't a problem. But the hookup to site #3 is the way to keep the system the way it is now, with the grid as a backup. Oliver could also change his mind and muddle through somehow, but I guess he wants an electric truck and more power to his shop and he didn't install a cable big enough for two 100 amp services when he built it.
The set aside would translate into the actual costs of the hook up if this drags on into construction season and I get the work done. So it might be lower than $15,000, but my experience with installing the electrical system tells me that's a safe number. It involves pulling a cable that is enough for 200 amp service to site 3. (I think it's called a 4.0 cable if you look it up). They come in aluminum and copper, the aluminum one is a lot less expensive and since they stay buried in the ground, it would be what I pick. When I looked into it last year, that cable alone would cost about $1,500, so maybe $3,000 installed. Then we would run another 30 amp cable to the house through a new conduit (the conduit is already in to site 3). 30 amps is the power at the house now. With the new setup, it might be able to expand to 100 amps, but that would cost more money for a new breaker box and a bigger cable.
A lot of details and choices. My current position gives you the choice of options and the money to do it. If you have other ideas, let me know. Just know that I'm not willing to just take the costs out of the price of the house and have it be 100% my problem. From my point of view, this is a problem Oliver created. Under our bylaws, if he disconnects infrastructure someone else was relying on, he's responsible for paying me back the money I spent putting it in and damages, which include replacement costs. I know that might sound harsh, but we have a lot of cases around Headwaters where we share things - wells, electric, etc. There needs to be some insurance that money spent won't be wasted, and that one person's choice might leave someone else without water, or in my case, without backup power.
This might be more information than you wanted. It is a conflict. It's unfortunate, but unresolved conflict can be a toxic thing, which is why there are provisions in the bylaws for resolving it quickly and easily. I tried, but I was unsuccessful. Anyway, as I said, bear with us. I imagine one of us will hear from them soon about it.
Cheers, Gwen