On 01/28/2013 06:26 PM, David Crawley wrote:
> I am convening a team out of the Hacker Dojo that is building a group
> designed Robot. We are building a differential drive floor robot, we
> expect the robot to have 2 front drive wheels and 2 rear casters. The
> intent is for the robot to be able to handle >>50lbs of payload, and be
> able to easily navigate anywhere that is ADA compliant (light outdoor
> use is implied). A drawing of the initial design of the robot is
> attached (design.jpg). We'd like the robot to be able to handle a 75mm
> (3") curb .
Other people are commenting on the curb issue.
The bigger problem you have is that by putting the two drive wheels
at the front, when your software decides to turn in place, the robot
will sweep out a fairly large area. Murphy's law as applied to robots
goes something like "A turning robot will knock over everything near
it." I know this from personal experience, since my large robot
platform is currently in the wheels forward format. The next iteration
will be pulling the wheels in somewhat.
The alternative is to pull the drive wheels closer to the center
of the robot, like the Roomba or Neato XV-11. This brings up
other issues about where to put the casters wheels, how many
caster wheels, how to prevent floor obstacles from lifting a
drive wheel, etc.
There is no perfect wheel arrangement. There is a range of
trade-offs
> We have various options for our drive wheels. Please see attached. What
> are the trade offs on these wheels? What is everyone's vote as to which
> wheel we should use? So far I have been guided to wide wheels to allow
> for light off-road use (this came from a disabled wheelchair designer
> who spends his life making driving a differential drive system through
> the real world).
I would use the wheel that does not leave skid marks all over the
floor. Black rubber is out. After that go for the wheel that
gives the best floor traction. Wheel slippage causes grief.
Regards,
-Wayne