On Aug 20, 2026, at 2:54 PM, A J <aj48...@gmail.com> wrote:Hey Folks,The vision part of Bots is really exciting. It is amazing how nature has evolved over time.Birds and snakes can see in a fourth color, like UV or IR. But mammals can compressmost of the information before it hits the optic nerve. I wonder if Bot cameras could dothe same thing.
![]() | |
On Aug 20, 2026, at 10:44 PM, Chris Albertson <alberts...@gmail.com> wrote:
--
<home-page-detail.jpeg>
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HomeBrew Robotics Club" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hbrobotics+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hbrobotics/8F9CA42D-969F-4BBA-932C-324D3E9421C2%40gmail.com.
![]() | |
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HomeBrew Robotics Club" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hbrobotics+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hbrobotics/b73296e2-33e2-4abf-b95e-fde52aa2d971n%40googlegroups.com.
In the end, we'll probably just have a number of cheap cameras and a modest compute module at the expensive smart phone level. While developing, having a range of smart sensors is probably desirable even if somewhat redundant.
The Oak-D is nice. I ordered more than one of the LooperRobotics Insight 9 with built-in V-SLAM, 188deg FOV.
I was considering the Pono P60-70M 3D Lidar sensor, but beyond the Insight 9's capabilities, I could use RGBD (image + depth). The current nice lidars are about $700-800. A lidar that provides RGBD is about $3000 now, and isn't that useful as the lidar data is always sparse compared to camera-style imagers.
They also have ultrasonic and laser distance sensors that could be useful:
https://www.positive-inno.com/
Because I need RGBD, the Pono guys pointed me to the NYX660/NYX650 for RGBD: Impressive, although I don't see a FOV listed.
https://www.amazon.com/ZICZNT-NYX650-Industrial-Waterproof-Dustproof/dp/B0DZSJ3FHL?th=1
Ouster has the RGBD lidar. StereoLabs Zed cameras have been popular stereo-capturing cameras for several years. They are now one company. And they have a compute module with a Jetson Orin. Nice combination, but expensive.
https://ouster.com/ouster-x-stereolabs
Their example use has 4 Zed X cameras, a lidar, and the ZED box to crunch all of that. They include GMSL2-to-Ethernet processing which is nice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf1FyvUAdpc
These are the needs I'm trying to solve:
Where is the robot and the robot's end effectors (head, hands, feet, tail, tentacles) exactly in space relative to the room or landmarks?
What is the shape of the space the robot is in?
Where is everything around the robot
How can the robot / avatar operator be sure it is not running over something or someone or contacting anything it doesn't intend to?
Need high-quality feed of:
Need to be able to capture & compress video at a hardware level with HEVC, ideally stereo with MV-HEVC encoding.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHyY6JWCqYM
Ideally just one sensor, at least in the forward direction, but likely 2+:
V-SLAM in a self-contained sensor is compelling, power saving.
If the V-SLAM device cannot run enough ML, might want another camera+ML processor like the Oak-D. Or just use a Jetson board with enough power for everything.
Stereo capture cameras are probably the best way to get high-quality stereo video for teleoperation. Until Good RGBD might be usable, could be better, especially for scene understanding and another layer of spatial presence grid tracking for safety. There is a latency minimizing reason this could be useful.
Lidar is a safe but expensive & limited range & resolution option, but provides 360 degree scanning. Probably something to use early on for safety & training, then eliminate unless inexpensive at that point.
Stephen
Hey Folks,
The vision part of Bots is really exciting. It is amazing how nature has evolved over time.
Birds and snakes can see in a fourth color, like UV or IR. But mammals can compress
most of the information before it hits the optic nerve. I wonder if Bot cameras could do
the same thing.
[source search engine]Mammals compress visual data in the retina before sending signals to the optic nerve. This process reduces data volume by over 90%. Bipolar, amacrine, and retinal ganglion cells remove redundant background light levels, extract edges, track motion, and stream selective details through parallel pathways.Key Types of Retinal Compression
- Spatial Redundancy Reduction
- Center-surround receptive fields compare light levels of adjacent points.
- Uniform areas of light or dark are filtered out.
- Only changes or boundaries at edges pass through.
- Temporal Redundancy Reduction
- Retinal circuits track changes over time rather than static images.
- Constant, unmoving scenes fade out of the active signal.
- Motion and sudden shifts trigger high-frequency firing.
- Parallel Feature Extraction
- Visual data splits into distinct functional channels.
- Separate pathways process luminance, color contrast, and local motion.
- Distinct retinal ganglion cells package these specific features independently.
- Nonlinear Contrast Scaling
- The system adjusts sensitivity based on overall ambient light.
- Bright daylight and dim night inputs use logarithmic scaling.
- This prevents saturation and preserves dynamic range within limited spike rates.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HomeBrew Robotics Club" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hbrobotics+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hbrobotics/60909df3-35f9-4925-be54-0404d6dda0can%40googlegroups.com.
|
Stephen D.
Williams
Founder: VolksDroid, Blue Scholar Foundation |
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hbrobotics/6846b48e-1092-41b3-8b72-21c52a20cb60%40lig.net.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hbrobotics/CA%2BKVXVPGLiHt4Zem8e-_pZjmy_xugUXq6%2B-3R2PZ9cUEddJ3HQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Very nice. How dense are the images from these?
Stephen
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hbrobotics/CA%2BKVXVPGLiHt4Zem8e-_pZjmy_xugUXq6%2B-3R2PZ9cUEddJ3HQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Great. Need to try that. I remember an earlier mention. Looks more interesting now.
This seems to solve the inside-out tracking that I was looking for.
I didn't find the FOV of your camera + lens combination.
Is some or all of your software open source or otherwise hackable?
The videos here work on Chrome, but only load the first segment on Firefox:
This is an interesting solution for getting 4 synchronized cameras into a single MIPI-2 port:
For a different purpose, no V-SLAM etc., I need a minimal camera (the OV9281 is good), but just enough of a microprocessor to receive the image & do simple processing.
Do you have recommendations for the most minimal, least expensive camera + microcontroller combination?
I can use the MightyCamera for now, but want to cut costs significantly for that application
Stephen
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hbrobotics/CABiSWvNEizwd_%2Bie1dJvEqJ-MuTZ-F7pXeVBW4xO3TzPG2Y8RA%40mail.gmail.com.