That is a great reference.
Helps validate whether all of the options have been considered,
for the main mechanics anyway.
This only mentions the sensor side.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "HomeBrew Robotics Club" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hbrobotics+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hbrobotics/946db0d3-82fa-493e-8e19-9b8634f84597n%40googlegroups.com.
Stephen D.
Williams
Founder: VolksDroid, Blue Scholar Foundation |
I personally like the three-finger hand—two fingers and an opposable thumb, with the thumb positioned between the two fingers. That configuration allows gripping almost anything,
Except for a drinking straw, sheet of paper, sock, wire, wet noodlle :)
On 9/30/25 12:24 AM, Dave Everett wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2025 at 17:10, Thomas Messerschmidt <thomas...@gmail.com> wrote:
I personally like the three-finger hand—two fingers and an opposable thumb, with the thumb positioned between the two fingers. That configuration allows gripping almost anything,
Except for a drinking straw, sheet of paper, sock, wire, wet noodlle :)
I have struct limits on my parallel gripper. Drink can, jar, mug, plate, gold nuggets.
If you can do 3 fingers well, 4-5 shouldn't be much harder. While the uneven geometry of the human hand seems unnecessary, sometimes it comes in handy. So to speak. In any case, it is an interesting design & engineering problem.
sdw
Dave