We are using a ReplicatedMap in a Hazelcast client. Client and server are both version 4.2.1.
The map is quite small (<10 entries, each value less than 100 bytes). The client only reads from the map, which is updated infrequently on the server.
We expected ReplicatedMap.get to be non-blocking, but during a long running performance test, we started getting warnings like the one below from vertx (which monitors for blocked threads). The first error came after 6 hours, so it is not easily reproduced.
Is there any way to do a non-blocking get? Or do we need to add an EntryListener, which maintains a local ConcurrentHashmap?
Clarification: The real issue here is not blocking vertx (which can be solved by moving the call to a Vertx worker verticle), but rather avoiding delaying the lookup. The business requirement is that we process messages in 50 ms or less, so even if we moved the call to a worker, we would be unable to fulfill that.[vertx-blocked-thread-checker] WARN io.vertx.core.impl.BlockedThreadChecker - Thread Thread[vert.x-eventloop-thread-0,5,main] has been blocked for 12777 ms, time limit is 2000 ms io.vertx.core.VertxException: Thread blocked at jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) ~[?:?] at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:323) ~[?:?] at com.hazelcast.spi.impl.AbstractInvocationFuture.manageParking(AbstractInvocationFuture.java:693) ~[hazelcast-4.2.1.jar!/:4.2.1] at com.hazelcast.spi.impl.AbstractInvocationFuture.get(AbstractInvocationFuture.java:615) ~[hazelcast-4.2.1.jar!/:4.2.1] at com.hazelcast.client.impl.spi.ClientProxy.invokeOnPartition(ClientProxy.java:188) ~[hazelcast-4.2.1.jar!/:4.2.1] at com.hazelcast.client.impl.spi.ClientProxy.invoke(ClientProxy.java:182) ~[hazelcast-4.2.1.jar!/:4.2.1] at com.hazelcast.client.impl.proxy.ClientReplicatedMapProxy.get(ClientReplicatedMapProxy.java:214) ~[hazelcast-4.2.1.jar!/:4.2.1] at my.package.StateGetter.getState(StateGetter.java:44) ~[classes!/:1.5.189]
Thank you very much - I had apparently not realised the difference between lcients and members for ReplicatedMaps.
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "Hazelcast" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/hazelcast/orUx-7Ioeb0/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to hazelcast+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hazelcast/0db63f9b-745e-432d-9c4f-49b9b1a6af50n%40googlegroups.com.