--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hazelcast-jet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hazelcast-je...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hazelcast-jet/923b740e-fca8-4b85-939e-81c3e354e40a%40googlegroups.com.
Hi,Is this the same problem you mentioned on the hazelcast group, or a different one specific to Jet?
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:06 PM <vladc...@gmail.com> wrote:
Using Predicates.alwaysTrue(). The cluster looks more or less stable, but the specific node manifest backup operation timeouts.--M
Dne pondělí 6. dubna 2020 13:36:19 UTC+2 Can Gencer napsal(a):Is your cluster stable during these events (nodes being added/removed?)Are you using predicates?
On Sunday, April 5, 2020 at 8:43:17 AM UTC+2, vladc...@gmail.com wrote:Hi,We occasionally experience very slow batch jobs and the only problem I noticed in Hazelcast diagnostics is a slow operation when doingReadWithPartitionIteratorP.java:127 (which seems to use MapFetchWithQueryOperation)Full stack trace attached as an image. Also, I see that Hz InvocationMonitor sometimes complains about backup-timeouts.Any idea what could be slowing down the iterator? Note that we're using Hazelcast Jet 0.7.2Thanks,Martin
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hazelcast-jet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to hazelc...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hazelcast-jet/923b740e-fca8-4b85-939e-81c3e354e40a%40googlegroups.com.