low profile?

[JLM]

I just wondered if this group was intended to be low profile among haxers, has it been posted as a topic on haxelang?

[e-cat]

I came here from Google +, where this group was posted by @Haxe ( https://plus.google.com/u/0/113704686911055424796/posts ).
So I guess it was not intended to be low profile.

[Jason O'Neil]

Yes Nicolas posted the link in his thread on leaving Motion Twin on the Haxe Google Group.  Hope I haven't offended anyone with my presence :)

It would be nice to leave it to some of the core contributors though - I trust that they know what's best far more than me... But it is interesting to hear some of the felt needs and see where I can help.

Jason

[Nicolas Cannasse]

Le 01/06/2012 01:16, JLM a écrit :
> I just wondered if this group was intended to be low profile among
> haxers, has it been posted as a topic on haxelang?

It's not meant to be exactly low profile, but we prefer to keep the
number of people small. The main Haxe group has often too many people
that tell us how things should be done without actually helping getting
them done, we would like to have mostly people that have some capacity
to act so we can define a proper strategy and actually apply it.

This is the reason I asked for people which "have long term interest in
Haxe and want to invest some time in the process."

Best,
Nicolas

[airfoil]

Nicolas,

I'm not an established haxer, but I'm happy to help in any way I can. I think the community is great and I'd like to help out. However, I completely understand if this list is for folks who are more established. If folks would prefer semi-newbs like myself to post on haxelang I can certainly do that.