Haxe

I have found some discussion about this issue, seems fixed at some version between 3.3.0 and 3.4.2.

Great thanks, I'll try this out! On Sunday, February 26, 2017 at 1:37:18 PM UTC-5, David Elahee

Great info, thanks Justin On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 7:17 AM, JLM <j...@justinfront.net> wrote:

Thanks again! I am very grateful ;) On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 5:33:01 AM UTC+1, Hugh wrote:

Your initial solution should have worked - dynamic has "inline ::Dynamic operator()(const

Thank you so much for the answer! I will try it as soon as possible and probably I will upload the

To give fair warning, I reserve the right to change this (__ArgCount) to something else (possibly

Thanks for the suggestions! I'll make some updates to the post soon. Best, -Jeff

Am 05.11.2014 um 18:08 schrieb Juraj Kirchheim: This is interesting. When string fields in anonymous

I think you should provide a bit more complete example, like a mini buildable JS project where the

I think reflective accessing and the resolve feature should implement different types. eg Dynamic<

Hi, Jonas. I wasn't aware about this document. I already downloaded it and started reading it.

You are welcome! 2013. november 29., péntek 0:09:23 UTC+1 időpontban Marcio Andrey Oliveira a

Could you provide a complete reproducible example? четверг, 28 ноября 2013 г., 21:53:25 UTC+4

Hi, if you look at this class: class TestInline { static function main() { trace(test(""));

Thnx for the explanation Jason, I understand the Macro element changes the code on compile time. I

Ok that won't work I am thinking of Null<Int> not sure Null<Dynamic> would exist but

This way the hashing wouldn't be equal across plattforms. Of course I could write a wrapper which

You can also create anonymous functions that act as factories for your levels. Then everything is

Hi again! I found two ways to solve this. :) Juraj, thank you for the idea to parameterize the get/

Hi, This looks like a bug in the cpp backend that can't be resolved without a compiler update.