I can use SVN without problem - it was more a question of having the
equivalent of a binary release in a source release.
The particular reason for my request is that if I build a library and
tell users that it's compatible with, for example, Haxe 2.10, such
library must compile with the release published officially on the Haxe
Web site (I think it's what users would expect). Since Haxe's binary
release is not available in Linux 64 bit, I must build the compiler from
source. If the compiler that I use differs in features or bugs with the
official binary release, I cannot know if its output will be truly
compatible with version I'm trying to target. It's just about having a
stable baseline and having a certain expectation of compatibility.
If, using the SVN tag 2-10, I can have the exact equivalent of what is
actually available for download on the official Web site, then problem
solved, I'll be more than happy to use SVN :-) . And of course if I come
across bugs I'll make sure to report them!
Nicolas Cannasse a écrit :