FW: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Efremov Sergei
From: Peter Jones [mailto:jones_...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:00 PM
To: Efremov Sergei
Subject: Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
BTW, I always get these error messages.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer...@google.com>
Date: January 30, 2013, 9:27:18 AM GMT+03:00
To: jones_...@yahoo.com
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
Hello jones_...@yahoo.com,
We're writing to let you know that the group you tried to contact (hawk-soft) may not exist, or you may not have permission to post messages to the group. A few more details on why you weren't able to post:
* You might have spelled or formatted the group name incorrectly.
* The owner of the group may have removed this group.
* You may need to join the group before receiving permission to post.
* This group may not be open to posting.
If you have questions related to this or any other Google Group, visit the Help Center at http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en.
Thanks,
Google Groups
----- Original message -----
X-Received: by 10.180.101.168 with SMTP id fh8mr1102976wib.1.1359527238800;
Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:27:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.180.101.168 with SMTP id fh8mr1102975wib.1.1359527238772;
Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:27:18 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <jones_...@yahoo.com>
Received: from nm7.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm7.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com. [77.238.189.21])
by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id w9si193100wix.2.2013.01.29.22.27.18;
Tue, 29 Jan 2013 22:27:18 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of jones_...@yahoo.com designates 77.238.189.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=77.238.189.21;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of jones_...@yahoo.com designates 77.238.189.21 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jones_...@yahoo.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@yahoo.com
Received: from [77.238.189.57] by nm7.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jan 2013 06:27:18 -0000
Received: from [46.228.39.150] by tm10.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jan 2013 06:27:18 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp129-mob.biz.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Jan 2013 06:27:18 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1359527238; bh=UTt3atbYReCe5Emaa54SHI5EgbmcmFfcPl70EjuoPnI=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:References:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Cc:X-Mailer:From:Subject:Date:To; b=0L+j3NiNDBfUkTYIhWK9JddCle1ngvOX57UyjkLWCUaHdWX+NCCVS2NI22hdgpbqhekl53hyIAhxyo/ZoC3BcuZryy72yRHowmprH69Ugmmlqq7Ek/704lRUX1QhDpVdIufq9IoPQRnf401RxBzk6lF/mdVI53BAbgmyPuH75OM=
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 333816.46219.b...@smtp129-mob.biz.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: Er2k3AwVM1lA90iXBYnMwskVhdYuBmdavrG5MoSb0WdhQNO
t3aQ_MOHmh7z2rWlvHqQYNa8DDuZxiptfZAFodd30RNVEPBginXYvaHUcjSr
XghwlGWCIxK.v7ejE69opiM2pfc83kPafBoi4YKMsfapXHLOTVDC54zuUJ1e
_lrt6sk_fJbZDCN8YwYe1K.FEJhnn0FcVydK0nsdmOucGD4TqaSlS2NdOgqH
uq8.bOhywmn2vCPFNdh73V3msAYWNy5CyN.vUPGGLCeoSCPTe_lEY2_L9UUz
z_umNRYmwJCCjwWgoBhojc2NNiTeQ1hK7.tIDHUXvj6iFp5.RfUrv0zXxMPU
N1h41_hT5wsAkZSaivgOfjyTecrNxok.P0fwH0lHL3tUBdKareZ0ZP.QBMZe
RO64L1vMfpCS21zeU9cwH.OcjihAId2Xtnxw478bmGEeX2xyhA9b9iBw4IvL
E2OcZvoKytmM7hA--
X-Yahoo-SMTP: i.pS8kmswBCe8EXyJgooMb0xUEINahocjeE-
Received: from [10.230.84.106] (jones_...@84.235.91.106 with xymcookie)
by smtp129-mob.biz.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Jan 2013 06:27:18 +0000 UTC
References: <01d801cdfd26$a1a126d0$e4e37470$@simagis.com> <510626c3.e81c3c0a.4e2f....@mx.google.com> <01fe01cdfd47$c2a1ee70$47e5cb50$@simagis.com> <1359381195.97181.YahooM...@web162303.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <025801cdfe0b$3ed05b30$bc711190$@simagis.com> <A3DF3B38-7594-4AA6...@yahoo.com> <029b01cdfead$78e73cb0$6ab5b610$@simagis.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <029b01cdfead$78e73cb0$6ab5b610$@simagis.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=Apple-Mail-83CE242C-E60D-45CD-93ED-D0D6EE12FDF3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <5A88444C-91C4-470A...@yahoo.com>
Cc: "<hawk...@googlegroups.com>" <hawk...@googlegroups.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A523)
From: Peter Jones <jones_...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: HAWK ver 1
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:26:53 +0300
To: Efremov Sergei <s...@simagis.com>
Hi Sergey,
Yes, I know it is not in GC-ROX, I wanted to know if it is in the Hawk-eye software yet. We will need it in ROXPlus, alone with the ability to process other curves.
Best regards, Pete
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:48 AM, "Efremov Sergei" <s...@simagis.com> wrote:Pete,
I think there is a problem here with TOC. Actually we don’t have TOC in GC-ROX at all, because we don’t have oxidation there. And in ROX we actually can hold only FID curve.
Best regards,
Efremov Sergey
Smart Imaging Technologies Co.
From: Peter Jones [mailto:jones_...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:01 PM
To: Efremov Sergei
Cc: <hawk...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: HAWK ver 1
I think this is ideal for me, especially for the legacy data.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2013, at 1:27 PM, "Efremov Sergei" <s...@simagis.com> wrote:
We have discussed the issue with our guys. I think you are right worrying about potential problems while transferring data to GC-ROX.
What we can do is to use *.csv files for exporting data instead of *.rox files. This will give us a way of working just the same way you work with Weatherford instrument.
More that this we can generate *.csv files automatically after HAWK-Eye finish process them.
What do you think?
Best regards,
Efremov Sergey
Smart Imaging Technologies Co.
From: Peter Jones [mailto:jones_...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 7:53 PM
To: s...@simagis.com
Subject: Re: HAWK ver 1
Hi Sergey,
TOC is not the same thing as THC. TOC is the "Total Organic Carbon" and is determined by summing the carbon from the FID during pyrolysis, with the carbon from the CO and CO2 curves during pyrolysis and the oxidation phase of the analysis. Is this supposed to be included is version 1? I know that David was having some difficulties with the instrument on some of this, but was not sure what would be included in the
Efremov Sergei
I have changed settings in this group so maybe messages will go away.