On Apr 25, 7:44 am, Rudypan <
Rudy...@aol.com> wrote:
> Wow. I thought I was the only person fascinated by these twisted
> little comics.
Welcome aboard, Rudy! It's an honor to have a nationally known member
of the
media like yourself amongst us. Please add links to your various
websites to your next post so all may enjoy the work of Mr. Panucci.
> I hope we can talk about the "Crusaders" comics, too. Those are the
> full-color comic-book-sized adventures of two super-evangelists who
> travel the world to defeat Satan. There were also produced by Jack T.
> Chick.
Of course we can. There's no "brown stain moderating" going on here.
Anything related to Jack T. Chick is open for discussion here (tracts,
comics, Alberto, Chaplain Dann, etc).
>One issue is dedicated to the satanic rituals that are used to
> "bless" EVERY SINGLE RECORDING SESSION for rock music. It's killer
> stuff, especially for someone who's produced rock music, but somehow
> never got invited to the satanic orgies.
Well, maybe they just didn't want to let you in on the fun (haw-haw!).
Seriously though, I don't think there are too many people that think
Chick would be called "accurate" in his research of most topics
covered in his publications. I look at it like I percieve "The
DeVinyls" (sp?), the Aussie duo from the 80's and 90's.
I really like SOME of their work, but most of it seems like pure
musical junk to me.
The stuff I don't like doesn't keep me from appreciating the good
stuff.
I've found that about 10% of Chick tracts are based on good doctrine,
and are useful in evangelizing. Most of them are so far out that they
actually send folks running in the opposited direction. It's like
being married to a fat girl who's got a pretty face - you take the
good with the bad (haw-haw!).
> I look forward to this list.
> Later, Rudy
We look foward to your future contributions and I hope you'll let
folks know about the list.
BDK