Thank you very much for accepting our paper and for the valuable feedback provided by the reviewers. We truly appreciate the time and effort taken to review our work.
Before submitting the camera-ready version, we would like to request clarification on two specific points in the review comments:
Regarding Tables 1, 2, and 3:
In our paper, Tables 1, 2, and 3 represent the results of different experiments and distinct model settings. The reviewer suggested merging them into a single table. However, since each table corresponds to a separate sub-task or configuration, combining them might reduce clarity.
Could you please confirm whether we should still merge them, or whether it is acceptable to keep them as separate tables for better readability?
Regarding the team name in the abstract:
The reviewer mentioned to “mention the team name in the abstract.”
Could you please clarify whether the team name is required to be explicitly mentioned in the abstract,?
We will revise the paper promptly once we receive your confirmation on these two points.
Thank you again for your guidance and support.
Peng Zhang.