Harp-l is currently mirrored on Google Groups. If you want harp-l via google groups go to
You can read it without belonging. If you join using the same subscribed address you have for the regular harp-l group at
harp-l.org you can also post from google groups. You'd set your regular harp-l subscription to nomail so you wouldn't get duplicate list mail. The google groups archive is not as extensive but it's growing daily.
So why not migrate the list to google groups? Google is corporate and they would control the content of the list. Live and die by google's sword. The single most valuable asset harp-l has is it's archive. Way back when harp-l was mirrored on e-groups. Yahoo ended up buying e-groups, that entire archive became inaccessible plus the actual group was compromised due to nobody knowing who had started it and for over a decade I couldn't get Yahoo to delete it even though there were nefarious links being posted to the group. I finally got it excised by complaining that posts there violated the terms of use of Yahoo. We are still mirrored on Yahoo but under a replacement name which I think is harp-l-archives. That group's content isn't really mine in that Yahoo ultimately controls it and that archive has diminished with time but since I am the listowner of that group I can delete it if things weren't working out. Every single post ever made on harp-l currently exists including the gapped years in the harp-l archive. I have everything. 20 plus years of archives is no mean feat. That treasure trove of data would not exist if we'd migrated to Yahoo or Google as our only site.
Regarding search, DO NOT USE THE SEARCH FUNCTION IN THE HARP-L ARCHIVE, it is broken. Use the Google custom search on the
harp-l.org web page. It's near the top and easy to miss. That search rocks. It works really well. Greg Heumann had several good suggestions regarding how to make the existence of a working search more obvious to subscribers. We'll work on that as we migrate servers.
I admin a Yahoo Group, several Google groups and a Mailman Group. The Mailman software allows much more granular control over what's happening than the other 2 choices. Regarding the thought that the current listowner prefers what is because it is what the listowner is used to, perhaps but understand that if the listowner is not comfortable using the list (s)he manages then what point would there be in that person being the listowner? Absolutely none. You might think then perhaps it's time for a new listowner and you'd be right if harp-l was losing subscribers, it's not. We serve a particular harmonica related market niche and it's not an insignificant niche.