Just to be a complete dampener, as Siu Yuin should know about me,
consider the last para of the paper. Self report without measuring
physiological, such as cheek swab for cortisol (stress) etc, not much
good. You need some independent corroboration. I did not see any
correlation of the MMPI scores with the subjects, but MMPI can detect
tendencies to want to project a good image. MMPI is useful for
extremes in behaviour such as those with schizophrenic tendencies etc.
not sure about self deceived 19-25 years olds. Truthfulness? not sure.
Also, since the group here are undergrads, i have some doubts about
generalising across population esp once people get older. I have some
misgiving if random effects analysis can apply here. Morevover, the
students are probably from Florida state university as 3 authors are.
Florida ain't New York.
Anyway, at 19-25 you are healthy. Measures such as getting colds etc
is a far cry from real health like hypertension, diabetes etc. I also
administer questions to students, and almost without exception, they
are very satisfied with their health. BUT i also do elderly, and that
is where the picture changes. The healthy are happy, but they are a
self selected highly motivated elderly who volunteer for experiments.
Studies like this suffer from the same technical challenge such as
"religious people live longer" etc etc. The paper is useful for all
the references though.
This study suffers from certain limitations, including the exclusive
use of
self-report measures. Common method variance is thus an issue to be
consid-
ered when interpreting our findings. At the same time, it is important
to
emphasize that common method variance cannot explain why some results
emerged, whereas others did not (e.g., PA predicted good health, but
NA did
not predict poor health). Furthermore, our limited sample of
undergraduate
students does not adequately address the issue of external validity,
as our
findings may not generalize to other age cohorts or highly illness-
prone popu-
lations. Finally, it should also be noted that the SIRS did not
measure actual
health conditions, but rather self-reported health symptoms. The
restricted
conclusions that can be drawn from self-report data highlight the need
for
physiological measurements of health symptoms (e.g., NK cells,
cortisol lev-
els, and heart rate variability) in studies of the relationship
between psycho-
logical factors and physiological well-being. Furthermore, objective
health
outcomes such as the frequency of hospital visits and the severity of
com-
plaints may provide a more accurate assessment of health. We encourage
future research to address these limitations as well as to empirically
evaluate
some of the potential clinical implications of our work.
On Nov 7, 11:54 am, Chu Keong Lee <
asck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Happy ---> Healthy?
>
> Happy - Healthy.pdf
> 89KViewDownload