Re: Apple heading to bankruptcy

[Big Crotch on a Small Fish]

Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Dec 27, 6:46 am, High Plains Thumper <h...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> Tim Adams wrote:
>>> You might note that the snit STILL claims Steve Carroll 'admitted'
>>> to posting as 'Steve Carroll's Dog' but that he NEVER supplied any
>>> proof to support the claim,as well as many other claims he made.
>>
>>> In the mean time, "Big Crotch on a Small Fish", as well as others,
>>> have replied to Steve Carroll's posts without adding much to them,
>>> giving snit a way of replying to Steve yet maintain his LIE that he
>>> doesn't read Steve's posts.
>>
>> Bingo, Tim, you hit the nail on the head.
>
>
> Snit's not even a creative liar... we get the same ol' boring crap day
> in/out. Can you imagine trying to live with someone that never
> believes he is wrong, lies through his teeth while repeatedly calling
> the entire world a liar? His poor family must be sick to death of
> him.
>
> I remember when his wife used to be able to use the internet (under
> the handle "sweet tomato") before Snit took it away from her because
> he was angry that Ebot posted some things Snit's wife had written.
> Here's one example:
>
> "Snuggle up to him, give him a hand job and ten minutes later he's
> satisfied and happy and you can roll over and go to sleep...lol."
>
> I guess you can't blame Snit too much for not wanting this kind of
> stuff posted online... and you could make the case that his wife is an
> airhead for posting it... but to take the internet away from her
> because of it is BS. She also posted some financial info and Snit got
> into a conversation with ed over it... pretty funny stuff;)

LOL! Snit is not just an idiot but is married to one as well. Ten minutes
later he's satisfied and happy and you can roll over and go to sleep.

LOL x 2!

It is legal for Snit to prevent his wife from getting online? Do you think
he lets her out of the house?

--
You Ain't the Biggest Fish in the Crotch

[Big Crotch on a Small Fish]

Tim Adams wrote:
> In article <oc-dnazng9Vkh4XQ...@giganews.com>,
> Chance Furlong <T-B...@megakatcity.com> wrote:
>
>> On 12/26/10 10:14 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> Tim Murray stated in post o6URo.65526$wf4....@newsfe05.iad on
>>> 12/26/10 8:55 PM:
>>>
>>>> Mike wrote:
>>>>> In article<dRdRo.17116$Zf2....@newsfe17.iad>, Tim Murray
>>>>> <no-...@thankyou.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Why would you be so rude as to include comp.os.linux.advocacy and
>>>>>> setup, rec.gardens, and za.org.cssa?
>>>>>
>>>>> because it's edwin the loser.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think it's zara.
>>>>
>>> The thread was started by "Big Crotch on a Small Fish" which is one
>>> of Carroll's socks. One of the giveaways is his obsession with
>>> glue (and I believe the account is the same one he used for other
>>> socks he admitted to using, such as when he was posting as his
>>> "dog").
>>
>> How do you know if it is Carroll? Would you be pissed if it is Edwin
>> or zara?

>
> You might note that the snit STILL claims Steve Carroll 'admitted' to
> posting as 'Steve Carroll's Dog' but that he NEVER supplied any proof
> to support the claim,as well as many other claims he made.
> In the mean time, "Big Crotch on a Small Fish", as well as others,
> have replied to Steve Carroll's posts without adding much to them,
> giving snit a way of replying to Steve yet maintain his LIE that he
> doesn't read Steve's posts.

LOL!