RE: [HamSCI] Digest for hamsci@googlegroups.com - 1 update in 1 topic

67 views
Skip to first unread message

euro.emc.service

unread,
Aug 4, 2025, 6:29:57 AMAug 4
to ham...@googlegroups.com

Thanks for sharing, Terry.

This NBS book is very valuable to me, even after 60 years.

With close to 500 pages, it might help me to understand some HF-effects better.

 

One is in the waterfall (SSB 2.7kHz BW) where I see on a regular base a few periodic , vertical intensity minima and maxima.

Sometimes the lines are vertical, sometimes left or right shifted.

 

It is a multipath propagation ionospheric effect, I think.

All seems based on time varying amplitude and phase shifts

 

Any more detailed explanation?

Thanks

 

mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards

 

Diethard E. A. Hansen

 

https://www.euro-emc-service.com  

 

Diethard Hansen | LinkedIn

 

Andy:  www.qrz.com/db/hb9cvq

 

 

From: ham...@googlegroups.com <ham...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 3, 2025 8:12 AM
To: Digest recipients <ham...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [HamSCI] Digest for ham...@googlegroups.com - 1 update in 1 topic

 

I4MFA W4MFA Eng. Marco Filippi <i4mfa...@gmail.com>: Aug 02 02:34AM -0700

Hi Terry,
referring to
> For details, check out this book
> by one of my mentors, Ken Davies
I noted above that imho chap. 4.3 (6 decades ago) has been nicely rewritten
by Bob NM7M (3 decades ago) and - I agree - it is really interesting to
understand the relationship between hmF2, foF2 and path (apart from any
consideration related to O and X waves).
 
Il giorno sabato 2 agosto 2025 alle 03:04:19 UTC+2 terry....@noaa.gov ha
scritto:
 
Gwyn,
 
Note that a radio wave in a plasma has a group path that is the the
measured time of flight of a signal which is what a pulse or FMCW
ionosonde would measure.
But it also has a phase path, and they are not the same, especially in a
magnetic plasma where the index of refraction is a tensor and the ray path
is not the phase path.
 
Observed Doppler shift is the time derivative of the phase path from Tx to
Rx.
 
For details, check out this book by one of my mentors, Ken Davies:
 
https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/MONO/nbsmonograph80.pdf
 
It's complicated.
Good Luck,
 
Terry W0ASP
 
 
On 7/27/25 03:02, 'Gwyn Griffiths' via HamSCI wrote:
 
Hello Marco
Thank you for your interest in my article on this topic in RSGB RadCom
August 2024.
BY the way, the RSGB kindly allowed HamSCI to include the pdf in its
repository at
https://hamsci.org/publications/measuring-height-reflection-hf
 
Assuming a spherical Earth.
Taking your example at 21 MHz on a 3000 km path with hmF2 at 300 km, using
the equations on page 43 we get the following for a Doppler step of +0.1 Hz:
 
Initial path length = 3120.952 km
Path velocity = -1.43 m/s
Path length change over 120 seconds = -172 metres
Path 120 seconds later = 3120.780 km
Height 120 seconds later = 299.719 km
 
Therefore minimum dH observable under these conditions is 281 metres.
Assuming also that all of the Doppler shift is attributable to the change
in height.
 
73
Gwyn G3ZIL
 
 
 
 
 
On Friday, July 25, 2025 at 4:03:12 PM UTC+1 I4MFA W4MFA Eng. Marco Filippi
wrote:
 
I found really interesting the work of Gwyn Griffiths, G3ZIL.
I was wondering about the minimum dH we are able to measure in 120" using
0.1Hz doppler resolution on a 15M 3000Km path, assuming foF2 at 1500Km=8MHz
- *obviously* - and hmF2=300Km.
I believe there is quite a difference (20X) with a 80M/750Km test as the
one reported, but I'm not sure my guess is correct.
Answer are welcome!
 
--
Please follow the HamSCI Community Participation Guidelines at
http://hamsci.org/hamsci-community-participation-guidelines.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"HamSCI" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to hamsci+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hamsci/d43c86bb-42bf-424f-80b7-96f1ca0b3b29n%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hamsci/d43c86bb-42bf-424f-80b7-96f1ca0b3b29n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.
 
 
-- Dr. Terry Bullett WØASP NOAA National Centers for Environmental
Information (NOAA/NCEI) Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental
Sciences (CIRES) Terry....@noaa.gov 720-446-9775 (google voice) 978-337-9092
(cell) "Life is Complex. It has a Real part and an Imaginary part."

You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to hamsci+un...@googlegroups.com.

 

~WRD0000.jpg
Message has been deleted

Bob WB0VGD

unread,
Aug 5, 2025, 7:10:48 AMAug 5
to HamSCI
Hi Diethard: 

Interesting comments!

Agree that NBS Monograph 80 is a great reference on the ionosphere...Ken Davies was a first rate writer and researcher. I first encountered his book during my high school years when my Dad placed the Dover edition of  Monograph 80 on my home desk. I started reading it and learned bits and pieces about the ionosphere and, as a result of my Dad's manipulation, I developed a deep interest in HF communications back then :-)

From your description of the patterns of the 2.7 kHz waterfall display, I think that you are seeing a combination of multipath and Doppler. For the past year , as a retired citizen scientist,  I have developed an experimental HF channel sounder using a combination of my ham transceiver and selected remote SDRs. This system has a 3 kHz bandwidth and uses PN sequences to measure the time-varying impulse response of an HF channel. While my system and associated signal processing does not provide absolute time, as an ionosonde does, it measures relative timing between scattering events and my Matlab software provides a time-varying channel impulse matrix from which I can get other time-varying channel parameters (Bello Functions). One of the plots that my code generates is identical to your waterfall display--in my code I call this plot the channel transfer function. In the near future, I will be happy to share some plots that I have obtained from baseband HF channel simulators and some real over-the-air measurements the 60m ham band. The patterns can get quite complex if you have multiple paths and high Doppler :-)

HF Propagation is cool stuff!

Best Regards & 73
Bob Johnk, WB0VGD
NTIA/ITS (retired)
Arvada, Colorado USA
Message has been deleted

euro.emc.service

unread,
Aug 6, 2025, 4:30:14 AMAug 6
to ham...@googlegroups.com

Hi Bob

 

Long time, no hear!

Thank you very much for your interesting response/comments on my periodic, propagation varying HF-waterfall “Fine Structure”-Minima-Maxima lines leaning left/right or being vertical.

I am eagerly awaiting your simulation/test results.

 

PS: off topic

I am working on an “EMC/HAM” paper TEMPEST related.

I have experimentally demonstrated UHF/VHF Spurs (RX port emissions, fully ETSI compliant) from 3 different K3S Elecraft HF TRX in my station can be used, (over the air, up to ca. <300m), to “remotely” read out my VFO QRG + Mode settings on HF .

There is a clear/complex correlation between HF (160 to 10m) VFO settings and Synthesizer generated Spurs. Motivation: On my QRZ.com und nearby 5. Ugly...D-QRM case here..

Stuff normally irrelevant for HAMs , but maybe interesting for other users.

 

Best Regards & 73 de HB9CVQ DK2VQ AK4IG

Diethard (Andy) Hansen

https://www.qrz.com/db/hb9cvq

https://www.euro-emc-service.com

 

 

 

From: ham...@googlegroups.com <ham...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 8:12 AM
To: Digest recipients <ham...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [HamSCI] Digest for ham...@googlegroups.com - 1 update in 1 topic

 

Bob WB0VGD <robert...@gmail.com>: Aug 04 07:25PM -0700

~WRD0000.jpg

Andrew Rodland

unread,
Aug 6, 2025, 6:12:09 AMAug 6
to HamSCI
Yes, that sounds like frequency-selective fading caused by multipath (and when you see the "barber pole" effect of the stripes shifting in frequency with time, it means that at least one of the paths is experiencing Doppler). It's a big part of the sound of long-distance shortwave, and it's also a major factor in the design of OFDM modems, because it can cause one or more of the carriers to be wiped out completely for some period of time (and maybe a different one a moment later).
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages