Hello hamnerds,
Thanks AI2Q for that earth shattering presentation
:) Sorry I had to do it.
I thought I would pass along a note from an
article that I found interesting.
http://www.geotimes.org/oct07/article.html?id=nn_talc.html
Years ago I had read an article similar to that
above article. What I had read was about how
California had funded and developed the ability to
take core samples at depths never before reached.
These core samples had found that talc was acting
as a lubricant and it probably the reason why the
earth quakes on the same fault line in Washington,
are much less drastic than the quakes in
California. So naturally, they back filled the
holes from their core samples with talc, with the
hopes that eventually, with enough holes, and
enough talc, perhaps they can obsolete
earthquakes. Or at least minimize the damage the
quakes cause.
As a point to ponder, there must be certain
thresholds of pressure that one could observer if
we were able to measure the pressure way down in
the earths crust. If a sensor could be placed deep
in the earth's crust, how could one get the data
back to the surface? Perhaps magnetic radio
antenna's. I wonder, if we had pressure sensors
that radioed back to the surface, could we
potentially detect such movements before they
actually happen, or at least know if we are due
for a 4.6 vs 8.0 quake.
Best regards.
.. ..-. / -.-- --- ..- / .-. . .- -.. / - .... .. ...
.-.. . - ... / .... .- ...- . / .- / -... . . .-.
Jared Harvey Operator KB1GTT
e-mail
ma...@jaredharvey.com
Web page
http://jaredharvey.com