Problems regarding the switch to InnoDB

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Darwin Bautista

unread,
Jan 7, 2011, 1:12:53 AM1/7/11
to halal...@googlegroups.com
Hi all,


I'm testing the head of default (b0551b729a). I'm unable to create new
Candidates, Elections, Positions, and Voters.
New Parties can be added though. In other words, most of the
functionality of the admin interface is broken with the new database.
Is this expected?


Thanks,
Darwin

Waldemar Bautista

unread,
Jan 7, 2011, 1:16:23 AM1/7/11
to halal...@googlegroups.com

Yes. The changes in the DB are not yet reflected in the code. I
haven't look at it in a while.

--
Waldemar Amado Bautista

Darwin Bautista

unread,
Jan 7, 2011, 1:44:19 AM1/7/11
to halal...@googlegroups.com
Oh, I thought I just missed something.

Anyway, I stumbled upon this:
http://codeigniter.com/user_guide/database/transactions.html
Seems like using transactions in CI is very easy. That said, are we
going to use transactions once the UI is fixed or is the extra effort
and complexity not worth it?

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Halalan Development" group.
> To post to this group, send email to halal...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to halalan-dev...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/halalan-dev?hl=en.
>
>

Waldemar Bautista

unread,
Jan 7, 2011, 2:57:30 AM1/7/11
to halal...@googlegroups.com
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Darwin Bautista <dar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyway, I stumbled upon this:
> http://codeigniter.com/user_guide/database/transactions.html
> Seems like using transactions in CI is very easy. That said, are we
> going to use transactions once the UI is fixed or is the extra effort
> and complexity not worth it?

Yes, we are going to use transactions to enhance the integrity of
Halalan. The Halalan models also need some refining.

--
Waldemar Amado Bautista

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages