As I wrote the media will not cover a story on undelivered product by a collectibles company via a public fundraiser. BUT they will most likely cover a story if it leads to some kind of law enforcement investigation and FTC law changes. This would be a matter of educating the FTC and using this failed campaign to educate them and made suggestions. Hal 9000 is well known to film fans so there is some intrinsic content that might appeal to Wired etc.
A group of diehard science fiction fans and 2001: A Space Odyssey take it upon themselves to alter the way public fund raisers on the Internet are run.
The same as it was with consumers lobbying the FTC to investigate cell phone throttling etc. Which was covered in the mainstream press.
The goal should be to use the Hal 9000 debacle to lead to positive change in the way public fundraisers on the Internet are approved, launched and managed and by whom. And in tandem, seek to protect the 650K that was already invested in the Hal 9000 project. Even a portion of those funds may have been used to create the masters for the product. The factory in China must be located and communicated with. Why are they also not listed in the bankruptcy if they were owed money?