It's a matter of two evils: Provide decent housing on floating barges right now for thousands of people vs. allowing them to live in tent cities.
In a hurricane or even a moderate tropical storm the tent cities will be blown apart as they were this past week in a tropical storm. On a barge, which is properly anchored and the shelters like the ones I propose are properly anchored to the deck...they should be able to ride out a vicious storm...only tests will show if I'm right....but I do know today...people living in tent cities and sub-standard T-shelters will not survive a vicious Cat 2 or above storm. Haiti's horror will be relived again and again.
I offer several solutions to this shelter problem...the cost of a decent T-shelter will be more than what the IASC has proposed...but if they pay a bit more now up-front...it will save them so much money later on. Or if a storm comes now and rips all the tents apart, they will start again from ground zero..they will not be able to justify the mistakes they made with these T-shelters and funding to help further will be next to impossible to get.
We, as concerned humanitarians need to make the appropriate noise to change the way the NGO's and aid groups are approaching the shelter problem and start doing it right from the onset...a second chance we will not get easily...and people will die because we made fundamental mistakes
I wonder if someone out there is listening to us? Or are we just pissing in the wind????.
Which is better?
Pay a little more now for a decent, workable shelter? Or pay less now for a tent and pray no more storms hit Haiti.
With land the prime issue of where to locate displaced people, the only place now that affords a decent and workable alternative is to place the shelters on barges on the water till a land solution is found.
I hope someone finds merit in my solutions.
All the best to everyone trying to help...between us all there is a great solution!
Edison