Thank you for your thoughtful feedback Dougal, I'd love to see how you're thinking about showcasing the data if you're willing to share!
My "red lines" are coming from the State Department of Natural Resources-defined maximum levels for each lake. As the
order for Mendota states, those levels "are in the interest of public rights in navigable waters and will promote safety and protect life, health, and property", so it felt reasonable to say if it's above the requirements then it is "too high".
In terms of the skeptical readers, I agree. I did try hard to define "too high" as soon as possible -- right below the words there's a large-font sentence which makes it more clear: "[The lakes] are above their state-required maximums." And right below that the first body paragraph explains what these state-required maximums are, and has links to the official PDFs where they are defined. The connection between the state maximums and "too high" might not have been clear, so I updated the website so that the header text now says "Too high compared to what?". Hopefully that makes it clear that "too high" means "above the state-required maximum".
Honestly if I could have fit "above their state-required maximums" in the graphic with any readability I would have done that.