: Ms_JERR_119830: Invitation to Review Manuscript for Journal of Engineering Research and Reports
Editor 32
Subject: Ms_JERR_119830: Invitation to Review Manuscript for Journal of Engineering Research and Reports
Note: If you have already accepted or declined our invitation, you are politely requested to ignore this mail.
Dear Colleague,
I am approaching you with the peer-review request of the below mentioned manuscript submitted in Journal of Engineering Research and Reports.
This journal is indexed in Index Copernicus (ICV: 91.65), CNKI (China), Google Scholar, etc.
Manuscript Title: Analyzing the Impact of Regret on Customer Churn: A Case Study in E-commerce
Manuscript Number: Ms_JERR_119830
I would be grateful if you would kindly find some time to review the above mentioned manuscript and send your valuable comments within (11 Jul’2024).
Complete manuscript and Review Form are available below.
https://reviews.oaacademicpress.com/119830
Password- Jfeiofjewf(9k)nkdfdPP
If you cannot download this file and if you require the file as E-mail attachment kindly let us know.
2. Benefits for Reviewers
2.1 Certificate of peer reviewing: After completion of timely quality peer review, we’ll be pleased to provide you official Certificate of peer reviewing (signed Scan copy). Please see a sample certificate here: https://oaacademicpress.com/cert/JERR.jpg
2.2 Publons: This journal is included in Publons (Link: https://tinyurl.com/publons-JERR), a part of Web of Science Group. After completion of peer review, you’ll get all the credit of your review works, which may help you officially in your academic career, promotion, research grants, etc.
2.3 Nomination for “Reviewer of the Month”: After completion of timely quality peer review, you will be nominated for the “Reviewer of the Month” competition. Winners of the competition will get prestigious “Reviewer of the Month” certificate (signed Scan copy).
2.4 DOI reference for reviewer credit: If the paper is accepted for publication by the editor after peer review, then reviewer’s name will be included in the Peer-Review-History link of the published paper as reviewer. Then the reviewer can officially write the DOI number of the paper and title of the paper in the CV as part of reviewer credit.
2.5 Annual Peer Reviewers’ Hall of Fame (APR-HF)*: Extraordinary reviewers will be included in “Annual Peer Reviewers’ Hall of Fame”. Photograph and short biography of selected reviewers will be published in APR-HF. This is an internationally circulated book with print and online ISBN numbers and DOI number. APR-HF book is promoted by Digital news channels, social media, scientific blog; you tube channel, digital press release, etc. Selection rules for APR-HF are given at the end of this email. (Link: https://www.scholarshof.com)
3. Very politely, we are requesting you to inform us by email within the next 48 hrs if you agree to accept our review invitation. If we don’t receive your email, we’ll move on next alternative reviewers. As part of the academic community, we hope you’ll appreciate our efforts to complete quality peer review within the stipulated period. Comments received after Peer Review Report Submission Deadline and without initial acknowledgement may not be utilized, subject to Peer Review Terms and Conditions. (Please see this link: https://reviews.oaacademicpress.com/peer-review-terms-and-condition/)
4. Useful Links:
Journal scope link: https://reviews.oaacademicpress.com/jerr/journal
Peer Review Policy link: https://reviews.oaacademicpress.com/general-editorial-policy/
5. How to submit review comment: After the review, please send back all the files (manuscript and review comments) to me directly as email attachment.
6. Kindly click on this link if you decline to our invitation: Declined to peer review
---------
With Best Regards
Ms. Ruma Bag
Journal of Engineering Research and Reports
Reg. Offices:
India: Guest House Road, Street no - 1/6, Hooghly, West Bengal, India,, Tele: +91 8617752708
UK: Third Floor, 207 Regent Street, London, W1B 3HH, UK, Fax: +44 20-3031-1429
*Reviewer evaluation for APR-HF
To ensure also a high quality review, reviewers are rated on a 5 point scale and reviewers with an average of 3 or more points will be included in APR-HF.
One point is assigned for each of the following:
1. The reviewer responded to the review invitation within the requested time frame. 2. The reviewer reviewed the manuscript within the requested time frame. 3. The review addressed all aspects which were asked for in the reviewer guidelines. 4. Reviewer gave suggestions to improve the revised version 5. The review was written in a friendly and encouraging way.