Re: Removed support for Gilead -> org.gwtwidgets.server.spring.gilead.GileadRPCServiceExporter

[George Georgovassilis]

Hi vezir,

We never integrated RequestFactory into the SL.

vezir <onurve...@gmail.com> wrote:


Hi,

Is there a simple tutorial that shows how to use gwt-sl and  hibernate by using requestFactory ? I googled it but i couldn't come up with any good solution.

Thanks,


On Friday, June 29, 2012 5:38:31 AM UTC-4, George Georgovassilis wrote:

Hello Maciej,

A while ago we tried to move the SL to maven. Gilead was a dependency but would not be available on maven. If you really need ORM on the client you probably should look into GWT's own request factory.

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Maciej Waksmański <gent...@gmail.com> wrote:

Why support for Gilead has been removed? How do I manage my project using 1.3-RC1 without Gilead? What is the replacment aproach for this situation?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gwt-sl" group.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gwt-sl/-/omYlrRstT4UJ.
To post to this group, send an email to gwt...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gwt-sl+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-sl?hl=en-GB.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gwt-sl" group.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gwt-sl/-/O-IUqGKAHq0J.
To post to this group, send an email to gwt...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gwt-sl+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-sl?hl=en-GB.

[vezir]

Hi George,

Can i still use gwt-sl 1.2 or an older version with gilead ? Or what do you recommend? Because RequestFactory seems so complicated for me unless i find a good tutorial.

Thanks

[George Georgovassilis]

Hello Vezir,

1.2 does still contain Gilead support. I think that exposing your internal domain model to the web has its caveats - i.e. dereferencing IDs, exposing information that the user should not see etc. and you would always have to keep that in mind and obscure the information before it leaves the server over an RPC and reconciliate when it returns. I used Gilead for a few projects and valued its simplicity and the fast results, but it only postpones the point at which you need to tear down the entire RPC communication and rewrite it by using DTOs, either because the payload has become too large, because of security concerns (i.e. anonymous users see the same amount of information as authenticated users) or because of the difficult semantics of when what has been loaded lazily and still needs to be resolved.

I think that the RpcFactory provides clear answers to that for data centric applications, but from an architectural point of view I would advise against the RpcFactory and instead use DTOs over regular RPC services for all the issues mentioned earlier.

On 07/17/2012 09:24 PM, vezir wrote:

Hi George,

Can i still use gwt-sl 1.2 or an older version with gilead ? Or what do you recommend? Because RequestFactory seems so complicated for me unless i find a good tutorial.

Thanks

On Sunday, July 15, 2012 4:30:06 AM UTC-4, George Georgovassilis wrote:

Hi vezir,

We never integrated RequestFactory into the SL.

vezir <onurve...@gmail.com> wrote:


Hi,

Is there a simple tutorial that shows how to use gwt-sl andďż˝ hibernate by using requestFactory ? I googled it but i couldn't come up with any good solution.

Thanks,


On Friday, June 29, 2012 5:38:31 AM UTC-4, George Georgovassilis wrote:

Hello Maciej,

A while ago we tried to move the SL to maven. Gilead was a dependency but would not be available on maven. If you really need ORM on the client you probably should look into GWT's own request factory.

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Maciej Waksma�ski <gent...@gmail.com> wrote:

Why support for Gilead has been removed? How do I manage my project using�1.3-RC1 without Gilead? What is the�replacment aproach for this situation? --

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gwt-sl" group.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gwt-sl/-/omYlrRstT4UJ.
To post to this group, send an email to gwt...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gwt-sl+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-sl?hl=en-GB.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gwt-sl" group.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gwt-sl/-/O-IUqGKAHq0J.
To post to this group, send an email to gwt...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gwt-sl+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-sl?hl=en-GB.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gwt-sl" group.

To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/gwt-sl/-/LbZuMm7oOpAJ.

To post to this group, send an email to gwt...@googlegroups.com.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to gwt-sl+un...@googlegroups.com.