http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html
One thing that stuck out at me was the naming of test cases. The
TestCase class has the same name as the class it is testing with the
name "Test" appended to the end. The test is also in the same package
as the class it is testing.
As for my time... it looks like I will have time sooner than I
thought, but that is still weeks away. Frankly I can't wait to get
back to doing some coding.
Rob
I realize that everyone has their own ideas about coding standards,
but for a project such as this where our sole purpose is to extend
some parent toolkit, we should emulate the parent as closely as
possible.
-jason
Does anyone have issue with adopting the Google coding practices?
Rob
> Does anyone have issue with adopting the Google coding practices?
for me, not at all. i briefly chatted with jason about this yesterday
and the argument is compelling.
rgds ash
http://www.gworks.com.au
Well... yeah :) I know that you have some strong convictions when it
comes to coding standards.
Bruce Johnson wrote:
> We checked in all that stuff (for Eclipse, anyway),
> along with instructions to set it up:
Thanks Bruce (and the team). That should make things a bit easier.
Rob
now it is simply a matter of adding those style rules to our gwt-
commons projects as well.
Thanks for all the hard work Bruce (and of course, everyone else on
the GWT team)!
-jason