I'm running the development version of Fedora x86_64. I recognize that rawhide isn't stable. I am just letting you know that GWD installs fine but won't start up die to a library version mismatch.
> $ google-webdesigner
> google-webdesigner: error while loading shared libraries: libgcrypt.so.11: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Here's the GWD library that needs libgcrypt:
> $ ldd /opt/google/webdesigner/libcef.so|grep not\ found
> ldd: warning: you do not have execution permission for `/opt/google/webdesigner/libcef.so'
> libgcrypt.so.11 => not found
> libudev.so.0 => not found
I do have package libgcrypt installed:
> $ yum list installed --show-duplicates libgcrypt
> Loaded plugins: langpacks
> Installed Packages
> libgcrypt.i686 1.6.1-2.fc21 @rawhide
> libgcrypt.x86_64 1.6.1-2.fc21 @rawhide
But it apparently provides a version that is too new:
> $ rpm -ql libgcrypt
> /etc/gcrypt
> /usr/lib64/.libgcrypt.so.20.hmac
> /usr/lib64/libgcrypt.so.20
> /usr/lib64/libgcrypt.so.20.0.1
> ...
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/red/libgcrypt.so.11/
Comes with absolutely no support or warranties but it's actually based on the package that used to be in rawhide pre-soname-bump, i.e. I only just added a 'compat-' to the package name so you can install it in parallel to the current version. Still, use at your own risks. Tested with google-chrome-unstable and seems to do the job there.
I tried
sudo yum install yum-plugin-copr
sudo yum copr enable red/libgcrypt.so.11
sudo yum install compat-libgcrypt
but all I get is
Loaded plugins: copr, langpacks
http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/red/libgcrypt.so.11/fedora-21-x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found
Trying other mirror.
No package compat-libgcrypt available.
Error: Nothing to do
I get the same behavior using dnf
What's the reccomended set of commands to use your compat-libgcrypt?
But for everyone's convenience, I've not built to package for F21 and F22 and these repositories should not exist. However, these packages have not been tested at all. Furthermore, this is as far as support for this packages goes - this has been the last time I've touched them in any way whatsoever. Nothing should require this exact version of this library anymore nowadays.
worked perfectly in Fedora 21, so thanks!
I confess I haven't been following the development closely, so much of what you said went right over my head. The results, however, are fine!