View this page "Design Documenation"
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Dinehart
Jun 9, 2008, 9:35:32 PM6/9/08
to GW SIG Tools Initiative
I have created a new page for the discussion of the newly created
design document, which I just posted. Please give it a look over and
let's discuss.
Click on http://groups.google.com/group/gw-sig-tools-initiative/web/design-documenation?hl=en
- or copy & paste it into your browser's address bar if that doesn't
work.
Go team!
design document, which I just posted. Please give it a look over and
let's discuss.
Click on http://groups.google.com/group/gw-sig-tools-initiative/web/design-documenation?hl=en
- or copy & paste it into your browser's address bar if that doesn't
work.
Go team!
Roane Beard
Jun 9, 2008, 9:50:16 PM6/9/08
to GW SIG Tools Initiative
I'm not sure what you mean by goal #3: "To forge a partner that
understands the needs of game writer." Do you mean partnership?
understands the needs of game writer." Do you mean partnership?
Stephen E. Dinehart
Jun 9, 2008, 9:52:34 PM6/9/08
to gw-sig-tool...@googlegroups.com
Yep I was struggling at that point.
Indeed, you are correct.
The goals need to be more clear, care to take a pass?
Roane Beard wrote:
The goals need to be more clear, care to take a pass?
Roane Beard wrote:
Roane Beard
Jun 9, 2008, 9:54:48 PM6/9/08
to gw-sig-tool...@googlegroups.com
Sure, if you want. I'm working on Open Office here, though. I'll take a crack at it when I get home and can edit it in word. About an hour or so.
Really, though, that was the only element that was unclear.
-Roane--
___________
Roane Beard
Staff Writer
Meteor Games
Really, though, that was the only element that was unclear.
-Roane
___________
Roane Beard
Staff Writer
Meteor Games
Stephen E. Dinehart
Jun 9, 2008, 10:02:20 PM6/9/08
to gw-sig-tool...@googlegroups.com
Cool, no biggie then. I'll just mod it,
thanks for the edit!
Roane Beard wrote:
Roane Beard wrote:
Roane Beard
Jun 9, 2008, 11:05:17 PM6/9/08
to gw-sig-tool...@googlegroups.com
No problem!--
Dinehart
Jun 10, 2008, 1:59:00 AM6/10/08
to GW SIG Tools Initiative
Version 1.1 is up
I just did some polish on the verbiage.
I just did some polish on the verbiage.
Dinehart
Jun 10, 2008, 1:59:23 AM6/10/08
to GW SIG Tools Initiative
Coray Seifert
Jun 10, 2008, 7:34:04 AM6/10/08
to GW SIG Tools Initiative
Looks great guys! Ship it! :)
Drew McGee
Jun 10, 2008, 9:36:49 AM6/10/08
to GW SIG Tools Initiative
Hey guys, I think it looks great. There are a few typos, but I'm not
sure if they're worth worrying about.
sure if they're worth worrying about.
corvus...@zakelro.com
Jun 10, 2008, 9:39:18 AM6/10/08
to gw-sig-tool...@googlegroups.com
We plan on giving this doc to Celtx before the meeting tomorrow. so
plese point out any and all typos you find. Thanks!
plese point out any and all typos you find. Thanks!
On 6/10/08, Drew McGee <drewda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hey guys, I think it looks great. There are a few typos, but I'm not
> sure if they're worth worrying about.
> >
>
--
Corvus Elrod, Zakelro Story Studio
http://www.zakelro.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/corvus
Ron Toland
Jun 10, 2008, 10:18:52 AM6/10/08
to GW SIG Tools Initiative
Thanks for putting this together, Stephen.
I found a few typos:
1) The summary for feature 3 needs a "to": "This feature allows the
user *to* customize.."
2) In the description for feature 3, there's a carriage return
inserted into "play designers": "play desi" \r "ners" (at least, on my
machine)
3) In the summary for feature 4, the "encourages" in the last sentence
shouldn't be capitalized.
Other than that, it looks great!
Ron
On Jun 10, 8:39 am, corvus.el...@zakelro.com wrote:
> We plan on giving this doc to Celtx before the meeting tomorrow. so
> plese point out any and all typos you find. Thanks!
>
I found a few typos:
1) The summary for feature 3 needs a "to": "This feature allows the
user *to* customize.."
2) In the description for feature 3, there's a carriage return
inserted into "play designers": "play desi" \r "ners" (at least, on my
machine)
3) In the summary for feature 4, the "encourages" in the last sentence
shouldn't be capitalized.
Other than that, it looks great!
Ron
On Jun 10, 8:39 am, corvus.el...@zakelro.com wrote:
> We plan on giving this doc to Celtx before the meeting tomorrow. so
> plese point out any and all typos you find. Thanks!
>
Drew McGee
Jun 10, 2008, 11:31:43 AM6/10/08
to GW SIG Tools Initiative
Ron, you stole most of my thunder, but I managed to unearth one more.
In Feature 7, the last line of the Summary says, "and values of said
variables can assigned to user defined data sets." There should be a
"be" between "can" and "assigned".
Hopefully, things go smoothly with CeltX!
Drew
In Feature 7, the last line of the Summary says, "and values of said
variables can assigned to user defined data sets." There should be a
"be" between "can" and "assigned".
Hopefully, things go smoothly with CeltX!
Drew
Stephen E. Dinehart
Jun 10, 2008, 1:09:09 PM6/10/08
to gw-sig-tool...@googlegroups.com
Hey if you see typos, point them out, or
better yet, edit them! Remember this is a group effort!
Drew McGee wrote:
Drew McGee wrote:
Stephen E. Dinehart
Jun 10, 2008, 1:09:48 PM6/10/08
to gw-sig-tool...@googlegroups.com
Awesome, can you update the doc to
reflect your edits?
Ron Toland wrote:
Ron Toland wrote:
Stephen E. Dinehart
Jun 10, 2008, 1:15:01 PM6/10/08
to gw-sig-tool...@googlegroups.com
Thanks Drew,
Good eye man, good eye!
Drew McGee wrote:
Good eye man, good eye!
Drew McGee wrote:
Ron Toland
Jun 10, 2008, 2:53:11 PM6/10/08
to GW SIG Tools Initiative
I've uploaded version 1.2 of the doc after fixing the typos Drew and I
found.
Ron
> >>Corvus Elrod, Zakelro Story Studiohttp://www.zakelro.comhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/corvusI just
found.
Ron
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages