> After a couple hours of setup, I seem to have every critical feature
Ouch. Sadly, I'm not surprised. Our biggest problem is lack of
documentation, but if you have criticisms to share, don't hold
back :).
> >gvn submit -c e7c2
> Submitting [user]/e7c2@20
> gvn submit failed:
> gvn: Server doesn't support setting arbitrary revision properties
> during commit
> windows-xp-i386.zip). However, our server is on RedHat and is running
> "CollabNetSubversion-server-1.4.2-8".
>
> Can anyone clarify if I will also need to install a "trunk" copy of
This feature is new in 1.5.0, which (*crossing fingers*) will be
out very soon now. So, you won't need to install "trunk".
Collab.Net is providing RPMs for the release candidates, and I'm
sure RPMs for the final release will follow soon.
> Since our SVN server is in production, I'm not real keen about having
> to sub in a new version (and migrate any config, hooks, etc.).
> However, I'm willing to do it if I'm relatively sure that doing so
> will fix this problem.
It will certainly fix the problem, but yeah, upgrading the server
may not be what you want to do right now. There is another
option. I've just filed an issue about it:
http://code.google.com/p/gvn/issues/detail?id=69
--dave
--
David Glasser | gla...@davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
> a) Synching the various tool versions. I put in python 2.5 first, then
> RTFM a little closer, and decided to just use 2.4 to avoid traveling
> an "unknown" path.
It should probably work, but there may be an issue with the
Subversion Python binding being built with 2.4 but loaded into
2.5. I'm not sure.
> Also I had to replace my existing svn client,
> change PATH vars, etc. I don't know if there is anything that can be
> changed in the install guide to help this, but nevertheless, this
Changing PATH is in the instructions, though maybe it's not
obvious enough that you have to do it (or just always use gvn and
never svn directly).
> b) Finding the workaround for the "svn ack" error (install the pre-
> revprop-change hook on the server).
> c) Finding the workaround for this "svn submit" error [see below].
Both these belong in the instructions; I'll add them. I don't
suppose you still have the error messages around? It would save
me the trouble of reproducing them :).
> Maybe that will help future users. Thanks again.
Yes, it's helpful, thanks.