Not likely ghost or anything else paranormal.
Just because our government agencies and their mainstream media that
has to publish whatever is handed to them (or else), as well as
contained within those K12 textbooks tell us that this extremely
nearby planet Venus is simply too hot for any kind of conventional
Goldilocks life as we know it to survive in the nude upon its hellish
surface, doesn't mean that imported and/or custom engineered life
couldn't technically manage, not to mention whatever the laws of
physics and applied technology makes Venus perfectly doable even for
the frail DNA/RNA and physiology of us humans.
As far as renewable energy goes, it seems the planet Venus has us beat
by a good thousand to one, and with such local renewable energy
abundance plus no apparent shortages of raw elements (including H2O
and O2) is where anyone as smart or smarter than a 5th grader could
manage to survive, with loads of energy and local resources to spare.
This is not to say that any naked Goldilocks is ever going to be
happy, or that pizza and ice cold beer wouldn't have to be imported
from Earth.
Here's that same old original cloudless GIF composite radar obtained
image file (as raw and not having been enlargement processed) that our
mainstream status-quo has been so deathly afraid others might actually
look at:
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hires/mgn_c115s095_1.gif
Without even downloading the GIF monochrome image, you can still
screen zoom-in on the small area in question (less than 10% of the
composite FOV), so as to keeping the raw 1:1 pixel format and its
rather limited resolution of 225 meters/pixel, and thereby have
yourself a perfectly good look-see at interpreting whatever that sort
of 225 meter per pixel resolution has to offer.
Here's one of my basic 10:1 resampled enlargements of the very same
area that I've pointed out to NASA and others of their Magellan team
for more than the past decade, that's still a generic composite
derivative like their original:
http://docs.google.com/View?id=ddsdxhv_0hrm5bdfj
If you'd care to focus on anything specific, please do so, because
I'm not certain that my interpretation of what the image depicts is
offering the best or only option.
First of all, I kind of doubt the surface is significantly cooler than
reported, however the most recent ESA data via their Venus EXPRESS
mission has been reveling considerable atmospheric thermal
differentials that haven't been reported and/or published by others as
having previously had essentially the same or better science data to
go by. Those polar surface temperatures could be considerably cooler
due to them strong atmospheric vortex considerations that's causing
such upper nighttime cryogenic atmosphere to draw energy from the much
hotter lower atmosphere and it's geothermally heated surface.
What we have here to look at and deductively interpret is a fair
number of unusually complex geometric patterns of unified or
associated pixels that don't seem to be entirely random geology
happenstance. However, there are a number of quite large items that
should be considered as natural, such as the "fluid arch" and perhaps
even that extremely large clover shaped reservoir could be perfectly
natural (even though the geology of Earth offers us nothing remotely
close to such size or geometric complexity). However, that extensive
and complex tarmac/airstrip as offering such an unusually flat item
situated within that mountainous terrain simply isn't as likely to be
formed by natural geology, nor is that highly unusual bridge item and
those multiple other large scale items of a nearby community of
geometric shapes and a their rational community like setting, of what
seems rather artificially structural and rational infrastructure
worthy should be closely reviewed by others to see if any or all of
those could have been formed by natural processes.
Other folks must have at least as good if not a whole lot better image
processing for this resampling/enlargement capability, so please do
share that better result with us, so that at least we can be on the
same page and not looking at entirely different areas. If you need
some assistance or advisements with selecting and/or utilizing a photo
enlarging process, I'll gladly donate my time and resources.
If you should interpret this image as only containing perfectly
natural hot rock and logical patterns of erosion, then you must also
have a number of reference example images obtained of terrestrial
geology and recorded by similar radar imaging resolution, by which
that interpretation of inert hot rock and natural erosion is based
upon, and naturally we'd like to have a look-see at whatever is within
your observationology frame of reference because you can't just be
making stuff like that up in order to suit a given opinion.
Brad Guth / Blog and my Google document pages:
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet?hl=en
http://bradguth.blogspot.com/
http://www.wanttoknow.info/
On Jul 1, 4:03 am, Wretch Fossil <
wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could the "intelligent life" on Venus be ghosts, spirits, etc.?
>
> Wretch Fossil 寫道:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Please tell me your basic ideas that are not accepted by mainstream.
>
> > > Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth,BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
> > > > On 6月29日, 下午10時29分,BradGuth<
bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > The "evil media" is saturated by Semites that have a cult/cabal policy
> > > > > and agenda of their own, plus otherwise being intently guarded by the
> > > > > mostly public-funded GOP/ZNR FUD-masters of the most brown-nosed
> > > > > redneck kind, that'll topic/author stalk and bash anyone suggesting
> > > > > revisions or additions to whatever our K12 and higher education has
> > > > > been telling us..
>
> > > > > This is exactly why your terrific stuff and that of Ed Conrad, William
> > > > > Mook and myself are being systematically excluded or banished, even
> > > > > though our investigative research and deductive interpretations are
> > > > > really not all that strange considering the evidence as based upon the
> > > > > best available science.
>
> > > > >
http://translate.google.com/#
> > > > > Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth,BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"