RTI - Maintenance Charges in absence of Occupation Certificate (URGENT)

[Dhanendra Pal]

Dear Members

I remember one of you got an RTI reply from STP Faridabad for one of the BPTP colonies that no Maintenance Charges can be taken by the colonizer till the Occupation Certificate is granted and legal possession is offered.

We need a clear copy of that RTI reply urgently. Please share with us ASAP at freedom...@gmail.com, that would be of great help. Many thanks in advance.

If any of you have a similar reply in any other case, please share that too.

Regards

Dhanendra

Secretary-FPLAOA

[FPL AOA]

Hi

Does anyone have the document requested in the trailing email?

Regards

Secretary

--
Вы получили это сообщение, поскольку подписаны на группу "Gurgaon.RWA.Forum".
Чтобы отменить подписку на эту группу и больше не получать от нее сообщения, отправьте письмо на электронный адрес Gurgaon-RWA-Forum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Чтобы настроить другие параметры, перейдите по ссылке https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Sandeep Sharma]

Dhanendra,

Without OC a builder cannot allow anyone to occupy an apartment. Simply refuse to pay if there is no OC. Rather under Hayrana Apartmemt Ownership Act / Rules it is illegal to let someone occupy the apartment without OC.

Regards

Sandeep

[Mukesh Ghiya]

Dear All

I got a whats app msg that Mr. Raman Sharma, an active member of this forum (from Malibu) got abducted by builder lobby and missing.

Can anybody throw some light on this issue.

Regards

 

Mukesh

---

From: Sandeep Sharma <idsa...@gmail.com>
To: Gurgaon-...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: RWA-Forum RTI - Maintenance Charges in absence of Occupation Certificate (URGENT)

Чтобы отменить подписку на эту группу и больше не получать от нее сообщения, отправьте письмо на электронный адрес Gurgaon-RWA-Fo...@googlegroups.com.

[Vikas Gupta]

That was early this year. He had returned after a few months. I remember having spoken to him a few weeks before.

Vikas
Sent from my Hand Phone. Please excuse brevity & spell mistakes.

[FPL AOA]

Dear Sandeep

What you have said is legally correct, but you know this is not how things happen on ground. Builder offer possession without OC, apartment owners take possession without OC, 90% of them unknowingly and 10% knowingly but to manage their finances they have little option.

In our case illegal act has already been done by the builder. We had no OC for 2 out of 9 towers. 7 Towers had the OC. The 7 towers paid maintenance and 2 towers didn't pay. Now the fight is for the IBMS deposit. Builder is claiming maintenance from 2 towers without OC for the entire past period and is deducting that unpaid maintenance charges with interest from IBMS. We need to prove to the court that the maintenance charges for towers without OC that builder is seeking to deduct from IBMS was never payable to them. This is not written in BLACK & WHITE in the act anywhere. There was an RTI response from DGTCP/STP on this. That would be helpful in our case.

Regards

Secretary