The Bark
Published on The Bark
Home
Guide Dogs for the Blind
Work of Dogs
Guide Dogs for the Blind changes training methods, and the results are
amazing.
By
Mardi Richmond [3]
, MA, CPTD-KA
Jenai Garcia, Apprentice Instructor for Guide Dogs for the Blind
Jenai Garcia, Apprentice Instructor for Guide Dogs for the Blind
In the dog-training world, “crossing over” refers to switching from using
old-school traditional training methods (catching the dog making a mistake and
correcting that mistake) to modern positive- reinforcement methods (catching the
dog doing something right and rewarding those good choices).
Quietly and without fanfare, Guide Dogs for the Blind [4] (GDB)—an
organization with a rich history and proven track record of training safe and
effective guide dogs—began the process of crossing over almost a decade ago. The
results have been nothing short of astounding.
According to Michele Pouliot, GDB’s director of research and development,
Karen Pryor Academy [5] faculty member, international Freestyle champion and the
force behind the switch, success rates have soared. Using traditional methods,
roughly 45 to 50 percent of the dogs entering the formal training process made
guide dog status. With the incorporation of clicker training (one type of
positive reinforcement), 60 to 85 percent graduate and are successfully paired
with a blind partner.
The transition officially began within the training department in 2006.
Then, in 2013, GDB adopted an organizationwide mission of maximizing the use of
positive reinforcement in all departments. Their current goal is to roll out the
changes over a five-year period. All of the dogs in GDB programs— the dogs in
formal training, of course, but also the breeding dogs, the smallest puppies and
even career-change dogs— will benefit from the commitment to clicker training.
For those in the formal training program, the advantages are already
clear.
“The dogs are more enthusiastic, better thinkers and problem solvers,” says
Pouliot. “Their attitude is over the top. They are confident of the job. They
want to do it—they can’t wait to do it!” Pouliot says that dogs who are not part
of formal training, such as the breeding dogs, will also gain from the
transition. For example, rather than being wrestled on and off exam tables,
breeding dogs will be taught to happily get on and off by themselves. This will
eliminate some of the stress experienced by both dogs and veterinary
staff.
People will also be affected by the switch to clicker-training protocols.
Puppy-raising families, volunteers and the blind partners with whom the dogs are
paired will all be learning the power of positive reinforcement training. As
they are exposed to positive reinforcement, they will learn to notice and
acknowledge what the dogs are doing right, rather than looking for mistakes.
Those of us who have experienced this transition know that it has the potential
to be life altering.
Karen Pryor, CEO of Karen Pryor Clicker Training [6], author of Don’t Shoot
the Dog [7] and the person largely credited with bringing clicker methods to dog
training, is equally excited by how positive reinforcement training affects
people. Pryor says that learning to train this way is rewarding, and the
training itself can be a powerful experience.
As an example, Pryor says she watched a blind handler learn to teach his
dog to find things like the mailbox and a signal- crossing button. “What was
really amazing was watching this well-dressed man and the expression on his face
when he got to reward his dog. He was empowered in this process, too.”
Pouliot says that the impact of clicker training on the dogs has been more
than she originally expected. “We hoped we’d get the same performance, but a
happier dog. What we didn’t expect was how much better the performance would
be.”
One of the initial challenges Pouliot faced was teaching the dogs to ignore
food in the environment. Trainers were concerned that using food in training
might make it more difficult for the dogs to learn to leave other food alone—a
fair concern, to be sure. What they discovered, however, was just the opposite.
Clicker-trained dogs were much more successful at this than dogs trained with
traditional techniques.
Part of what worked was having a specific food-delivery protocol—a list of
food do’s and don’ts that helped make it clear for the dogs. For example, the
dogs are not rewarded on the ground, only by the person handling the dog and
only when the dog stands in a specific position. Pouliot says that consistency
with the protocol is important to a dog’s success.
Like many monumental changes, GDB’s crossing over had humble beginnings. “I
started with Guide Dogs for the Blind in 1974,” says Pouliot. “I grew up with
them, learning traditional training techniques: waiting for the dog to do
something wrong, correcting it and then praising for the right response.” She
was entrenched in traditional training, as was the rest of the
organization.
For Pouliot, the change began in 2000 when she explored clicker training
with her own dogs and horses. Pouliot says that when she clicker-trained her
horses—not just one, but all of them—to retrieve objects from across a field,
she knew she was on to something very powerful. “That was my big ‘a-ha’ moment.
I was so impressed with the success.”
Inspired, Pouliot went to work trying out clicker training with the guide
dog program in mind. She conducted a few unofficial trials, training dogs who
had already been dropped from the program for various reasons. One, a young
female yellow Lab, was too afraid of other dogs to be successful as a guide dog.
Pouliot began clicker training her with the primary goal of reducing her fear.
Not only was Pouliot successful in turning around the dog’s fearful response—the
young Lab went from being scared to actively engaging with the other dogs—but
also, the Lab was able to finish training and go on to be a career guide
dog.
This and other equally exciting results encouraged Pouliot and others at
GDB to begin an official pilot program. Pouliot and one of the training
supervisors, Lori Brown, would formally train two dogs using clicker techniques.
Because she had previously worked with dolphins (where positive reinforcement
training is the norm), Brown was a natural choice for the pilot program.
The other trainers chose the dogs who would take part in the program; their
candidates were considered difficult to work with, which set a very high bar for
success. But after just one week, the transition in attitude alone spoke in
favor of clicker training. The dogs had switched from being low energy and
lacking enthusiasm to being animated and excited.
Following the initial success of the pilot program, Pouliot and her
colleagues began working on specific procedures and techniques. By 2006, GDB was
educating all 65 trainers on two campuses in this “new” method.
“The transition wasn’t instant,” says Pouliot. “In fact, it has been a long
journey.” Because they couldn’t stop the training program long enough to
establish the new routines and teach all the staff at once, progress was
incremental. “We had to teach the staff in small chunks. Each year, we would add
new pieces.”
Pouliot acknowledges that it was a challenge at times. Consider
trainers—good trainers with 20 or more years of experience— being asked to learn
and embrace new methods. But once they saw for themselves how powerful the
method was, everyone got excited, and the transition moved forward at a steady
pace.
Guide Dogs for the Blind’s organization-wide crossover to clicker training
has and will continue to have a tremendous and powerful effect on the people and
animals associated with its programs. But the reach of this transition has
already been felt far beyond the immediate scope of the organization. Pouliot
and GDB have shared the success of their program with guide-dog trainers
worldwide through a series of weeklong seminars.
Pryor says that what GDB and Pouliot have done is not just develop a model
for training guide- and other service dogs, but also showed how to reach people
and organizations entrenched in traditions, and how to help them successfully
make changes.
She also points out that the success of this program and the lessons
learned about working in a positive manner for positive changes have had a big
influence on her own life, giving her better tools to help with organizational
transitions.
The magnitude of change brought about by the use of principles of positive
reinforcement will continue to ripple outward to the larger guide dog world, the
even larger service-dog-training world and beyond. How far? Imagine the power
when a family-dog trainer can say to a doubting client, “These are similar to
the methods used by Guide Dogs for the Blind. Let’s give them a try and see if
they might work for your dog, too.”
Special thanks to Michele Pouliot and Karen Pryor for their contributions
to this article.
The Puppy Handoff
Guide Dogs for the Blind and Karen Pryor Academy have partnered with
clicker trainers on a new puppy-raising project. The kickoff took place with a
ceremonial “puppy handoff” at the 2014 ClickerExpo in San Diego. According to
Michele Pouliot, this joint project will help GDB explore various protocols for
puppy raising using clicker techniques. The project’s puppy raisers, all
experienced clicker trainers and Karen Pryor Academy Certified Training Partners
(KPA CTP), have a list of things the puppies need to know by the time they enter
the formal training program at 14 months. The puppy raisers are free to use
their own creativity in reaching the goals. The only thing they’re required to
do is film the training sessions. Pouliot and others will then review the
techniques employed by these trainers to learn more about developing the most
effective puppy-raising protocols for future guide dogs.
A Positive Change
When Dario, a nine-year-old black Lab guide dog, realizes it’s time to help
his person navigate the world, he’s eager to get moving. “When he sees the leash
and treat pouch, he jumps up ready to go,” said Theresa Stern, Dario’s human
partner. “He loves his job.”
Stern, who has been legally blind all of her life and has had three
different guide dogs, says that Dario is both calm and an enthusiastic worker.
She believes that positive reinforcement training has a lot to do with this, as
well as with his overall enjoyment of his job.
To teach Dario to find pedestrian signal buttons, Stern says she found the
button with her hand, then brought Dario close and had him target her hand and
the button with a nose touch. His success is marked (with a “click” of a clicker
or a verbal marker) and rewarded. “He learns so fast, it’s almost ridiculous.
Anything that we mark, he remembers,” Stern says, noting that Dario will show
the signal button to her the next time they travel the same path, and will even
find them in new places on his own. “It is a big game for him. It’s fun.”
Stern was born with an inherited retinal degenerative disease called Leber
congenital amaurosis, or LCA. While she has some residual vision, she grew up
needing a white cane to get around safely. “I always hated using the cane,” said
Stern. “It felt like it had a stigma attached to it.” After moving to San
Francisco, where she had to navigate the world on her own more than she ever had
in the past, Stern met some people with guide dogs. The idea of living with a
guide dog really appealed to her.
Blossom was her first, a super-sassy, confident yellow Lab, and just what
she needed. “I felt more comfortable when I had a dog,” said Stern, noting that
because she can’t make eye contact, she would sometimes have trouble connecting
with people. Blossom helped her make some of those initial connections and
dramatically lowered her anxiety about going out.
Stern says that Blossom was a great dog, but could sometimes be hard to
handle. The only tool she had was a leash correction. “You feel horrible when
you do it,” said Stern, who was yelled at by people who didn’t like seeing her
correct her dog. “Blossom would know she was doing something wrong. She would
anticipate the correction and would amp up even more.” Stern’s second dog, a
yellow Lab named Astaire, was also trained using traditional methods, though
Stern was able to introduce rewards into his training later in life.
Dario was clicker-trained from the beginning. Aside from a couple of minor
drawbacks (the less-than-fashionable treat pouch, for example), the difference
has been significant and positive. Stern credits Dario’s calm demeanor,
enthusiasm for the work and better attention to positive reinforcement training.
She says they both are less stressed when traveling together. But perhaps the
most significant change for Stern is that she no longer has to correct her dog.
“It is pleasurable to give him a positive something rather than just
communicating when he is doing something wrong. It is more positive for both of
us.”
Theresa Stern has been living with guide dogs for the past 20 years. For
the past 15, she has also worked at Guide Dogs for the Blind, where she is the
director of alumni and outreach services.
This article first appeared in The Bark,
Issue 78: Summer 2014
Mardi Richmond, MA, CPTD-KA, is a writer, editor and trainer. Her articles
on canine health, training and behavior have appeared in The Dog Trainer’s
Resource and Whole Dog Journal.
Photo courtesy of Guide Dogs for the Blind