The optimization always happens in the tangent space, so in theory or should not be a problem. There is a possibility that there are numerical issues that we don’t know about in computing the derivatives, so I would look out for that. For example, you could add some tests for the factors that you’re most interested in and use examples with realistic ECEF coordinates. You can always use some anchos pose to establish a local frame (that’s basically what UTM does) but *in theory* this is not needed. Come to think of, UTM has fairly big numbers as well and we did not run into problems then, I believe (this was for a DARPA project a while back).
FD
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gtsam users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
gtsam-users...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gtsam-users/831f34fe-3b0c-4725-9004-7d9408589735n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gtsam-users/BN7PR07MB483518AB7B5414156D7FE494CF139%40BN7PR07MB4835.namprd07.prod.outlook.com.