Jarred Walker’s post and others’ comments are thought provoking. Below is a blurb from today’s TRB e-newsletter that you needn’t read, but further illustrates the pervasive use of concepts (terms) which have yet to be thoughtfully sorted out, such as, TNCs, shared-use, mobility, public-private, transit, paratransit, demand-responsive, jitney, flexible, technology, dynamic, etc., etc. TNCs are an application of technology, not an innovative transportation service and, indeed, may be overtaken by some new technology next year. They are said to be disruptive, but to what? Certainly to the staid taxi industry, but Aaron I think you make an excellent point about convergence … or it could be a continuum or evolution of transportation services. Regulatory agencies may be panicking, but we can take time to consider how to adopt and adapt. - JB
A. Jeff Becker | Senior Manager of Service Development | Regional Transportation District | 303-299-2148
|
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GTFS Flexible Transit Working Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gtfs-flexible-...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.