GTFS Changes

The voting period ended on 2022-05-16 at 23:59:59 UTC. With 9 votes in favour and no votes against,

Hi everyone, I just opened a PR proposing adding new type of trip-to-trip transfers including in-seat

Hi Tristram, Please also announce the vote in the PR discussion. Thanks! Scott On Thursday, January

Hello, Google's python validator hasn't been maintained for a while. If it can help, the

The vote ended on 2021-12-06 at 23:59:59 UTC with 6 votes in favour and 0 opposed. This PR passes.

This PR was modified significantly so voting was paused before the previous vote was concluded. We

The vote ended on 2021-10-21 at 23:59:59 UTC with 3 votes in favor and 0 opposed. As per the

Hi everyone, PR #284 has been open to a vote for adding the following fields to transfers.txt:

Hi all, As requested in a continued discussion at #282, PR #285 proposes an addition to `stop_name`

Hi all, PR #276 to allow `pathway_mode=6` (fare gates) to be bidirectional is now open for voting.

Hi all, To repeat here: PR #276 to allow `pathway_mode=6` (fare gates) to be bidirectional is now

Hi everyone, The above contents have been put to a vote at #282. Voting ends on 2021-09-10 at 23:59:

Hi all, With 6 votes in favor and 0 opposed, PR #277 passes! Big thanks to everyone involved in

On Wednesday, July 21, 2021 10:19:44 PM CEST, Jeff Kessler (Keolis Boston) wrote: > *Is the

Hi all, Voting has been opened on PR #275 to amend articles 7.4-8 of the Specification Amendment

Hi everyone, We (MobilityData) are proposing some editorial fixes to `pathways.txt` and `levels.txt`

Hi everyone, We (MobilityData) are proposing some editorial fixes to the spec concerning the

Hi Stefan, Thank you for helping.i added the missing stops and it's working fine now :) Best

On Wednesday, July 29, 2020 4:33:34 PM CEST, Tetsuya SATO wrote: > In case, I don't set the

Hi Stefan, On Fri, 29 May 2020 at 22:35, Stefan de Konink <stefan@konink.de> wrote: > Was

Hi all, We're trying to get feedback, from producers in particular (AVL/APC vendors included), on

The proposition is now adopted! On Wednesday, May 6, 2020 at 7:10:01 PM UTC-4, Tim Millet wrote: The

FWIW, Transitland does currently have unique identifiers for operators/agencies using a "Onestop

To all in favor of this proposal. Tim has extended the proposal with an implementation suggestion,

Hi Stefan, Thanks for raising those questions. I think most of the stakeholders active in this Google

A pull request has been opened on GitHub to discuss adding GTFS-Vehicles (core only) in the

A follow up on this: A requested support from Google and they recommended to convert from scheduled

Vote has been re-opened on this proposal. To vote or comment, please go to: https://github.com/google

The voting period has ended and the pull request is now adopted. On Friday, December 13, 2019 at 9:07

Vote has been re-open on the GTFS-Translations proposal, since a consensus has been reached on the