Re: Digest for gtasks@googlegroups.com - 2 Messages in 1 Topic

11 views
Skip to first unread message

mark palmos

unread,
Aug 16, 2010, 6:56:14 AM8/16/10
to gta...@googlegroups.com
Hi
I have not used Peter's for a while, but in your point #2, I seem to remember it was necessary to Save your task in Peters version. In Dato's you just press the back button and it saves while it goes back... much nicer, one less step there.

Of course I will not pay $8 for a task programme, Dato must be crazy... especially after buying Peter's.

Mark.


On 15 August 2010 19:43, <gtasks+...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/gtasks/topics

    mdfritz <mdfr...@gmail.com> Aug 14 03:12PM -0700 ^
     
    I would have to ditto all of this. However, after I jumped ship and
    went with Dato's gtasks for a while, I noticed that Dato's version
    lacked a few critical functionality features that Peter's app
    implements well. Put them both to the test and see for yourself:
     
    1. background sync: I added a mission critical task on my PC. ran to
    an appointment for work, looked for the task on Dato's Gtask. Low and
    behold--not there. I had to manually sync it to get it to show up and
    I wasn't in the fastest data network area, so it wasn't a seamless
    experience like it used to be with Peter's app.
    Try putting the two widgets (Peter's and Dato's) side by side for the
    same list and add a task on your PC and see which widget syncs on its
    own in the background.
     
    2. Quickly adding a task from the list view (not the widget quick
    add): Dato's makes you use the menu button to pull up a "new task"
    button. I find that a bit annoying. Peter's has a quick add box at the
    top of each list. (Note, however, that adding a task from Dato's
    widget is a lot quicker than Peter's widget).
     
    3. List swipe fluidity: Dato's animations are eratic and laggy.
    Peter's version isn't flashy, but swiping lists is pretty darn quick
    and reliable.
     
    I know there are a lot more useful features on Dato's that we have all
    been waiting for, but to be honest, since we didn't have them before,
    I never got into the habit of indenting and moving tasks up and down
    or from list to list on my phone, so I never really felt compelled to
    those on features Dato's gtasks anyway.
     
    For now I think I will switch back to using Peter's but keep them both
    on my phone until someone out does the other in both features AND
    functionality.
     

     

    mdfritz <mdfr...@gmail.com> Aug 14 03:12PM -0700 ^
     
    I would have to ditto all of this. However, after I jumped ship and
    went with Dato's gtasks for a while, I noticed that Dato's version
    lacked a few critical functionality features that Peter's app
    implements well. Put them both to the test and see for yourself:
     
    1. background sync: I added a mission critical task on my PC. ran to
    an appointment for work, looked for the task on Dato's Gtask. Low and
    behold--not there. I had to manually sync it to get it to show up and
    I wasn't in the fastest data network area, so it wasn't a seamless
    experience like it used to be with Peter's app.
    Try putting the two widgets (Peter's and Dato's) side by side for the
    same list and add a task on your PC and see which widget syncs on its
    own in the background.
     
    2. Quickly adding a task from the list view (not the widget quick
    add): Dato's makes you use the menu button to pull up a "new task"
    button. I find that a bit annoying. Peter's has a quick add box at the
    top of each list. (Note, however, that adding a task from Dato's
    widget is a lot quicker than Peter's widget).
     
    3. List swipe fluidity: Dato's animations are eratic and laggy.
    Peter's version isn't flashy, but swiping lists is pretty darn quick
    and reliable.
     
    I know there are a lot more useful features on Dato's that we have all
    been waiting for, but to be honest, since we didn't have them before,
    I never got into the habit of indenting and moving tasks up and down
    or from list to list on my phone, so I never really felt compelled to
    those on features Dato's gtasks anyway.
     
    For now I think I will switch back to using Peter's but keep them both
    on my phone until someone out does the other in both features AND
    functionality.
     

     


mdfritz

unread,
Aug 16, 2010, 2:52:17 PM8/16/10
to gTasks
Actually, on dato's you have to hit back 2x to get back to list view
(1 time to kill the keyboard and 1 more time to get back to the list
view. On Peter's you can save the note and get back to list view in
one click of either the plus button or done key on the keyboard.


On Aug 16, 6:56 am, mark palmos <mark.pal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
> I have not used Peter's for a while, but in your point #2, I seem to
> remember it was necessary to Save your task in Peters version. In Dato's you
> just press the back button and it saves while it goes back... much nicer,
> one less step there.
>
> Of course I will not pay $8 for a task programme, Dato must be crazy...
> especially after buying Peter's.
>
> Mark.
>
> On 15 August 2010 19:43,
> <gtasks+...@googlegroups.com<gtasks%2Bno...@googlegroups.com>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >   Today's Topic Summary
>
> > Group:http://groups.google.com/group/gtasks/topics
>
> >    - Dear Peter, I'm disappointed... <#12a7710352a61aea_group_thread_0> [2
> >    Updates]
>
> >   Topic: Dear Peter, I'm disappointed...<http://groups.google.com/group/gtasks/t/a9a2b4d461720693>
>
> >    mdfritz <mdfrit...@gmail.com> Aug 14 03:12PM -0700 ^<#12a7710352a61aea_digest_top>
> >    mdfritz <mdfrit...@gmail.com> Aug 14 03:12PM -0700 ^<#12a7710352a61aea_digest_top>
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages