Hello,
We don’t support, or endorse the use of enrichR for performing set analysis. My recommendation would be to run a proper Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, using the GSEA Desktop software with the latest MSigDB gene sets and gene mapping tables (chip files). This should provide a much more robust analysis than the enrichR analysis, which also appears to be using quite old versions of MSigDB.
That said, one reason this could be occurring is that gene symbols are not really a stable namespace and some may have changed between the two versions there (“Hallmark_2020” is not a proper MSigDB version so it’s impossible to say which specifically that is), but if its different than the 7.2 release you used in the second analysis, then a different number of genes may have been identified in your dataset resulting in a slightly different scoring.
-Anthony
Anthony S. Castanza, PhD
Curator, Molecular Signatures Database
Mesirov Lab, Department of Medicine
University of California, San Diego
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gsea-help" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gsea-help+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gsea-help/fb3b3660-51e4-470c-83ba-1cdab66b726bn%40googlegroups.com.