Hello,
Thank you for reaching out to us about this issue. My apologies in the delay getting back to you.
After investigating your report I think the issue might actually be a deeper inversion in the set labeling than you've indicated.
The gene members of FOSTER_TOLERANT_MACROPHAGE_DN do appear to originate from the "a) Class T genes" column of Supplementary table 1 of the publication as indicated in the Exact Source field of the gene set details, and likewise FOSTER_TOLERANT_MACROPHAGE_UP originates from the "b) Class NT genes" portion of the data.
This says to me that not only do the descriptions need to be corrected as you've indicated, the set names will also need to be corrected to fix this inversion.
In the next release, based on this information, I'll plan to rename FOSTER_TOLERANT_MACROPHAGE_DN to FOSTER_TOLERANT_MACROPHAGE_UP, with the description:
"Class
T (tolerizable) genes: induced during the first LPS stimulation and not
re-induced or induced to a much lesser degree in tolerant macrophages
(as defined by (N+L)/(T+L) > 3).", and associating it with the gene list from the current _DN set which originates from the "Class T Genes" data.
And likewise, the current
FOSTER_TOLERANT_MACROPHAGE_UP set will be renamed FOSTER_TOLERANT_MACROPHAGE_DN with the description "Class
NT (non-tolerizable) genes: induced during the first LPS stimulation
and induced at equal or greater degree in tolerant macrophages (as
defined by (N+L)/(T+L) ≤ 1).", and associating it with the gene list from the current _DN set which originates from the "Class NT Genes" data.
Do these changes meet the expectations you would have had if you were to have encountered these sets in your results?
-Anthony
Anthony S. Castanza, PhD
Curator, Molecular Signatures Database
Mesirov Lab, Department of Medicine
University of California, San Diego