significant digits

[Wynne Chin]

First off, congratulations to the groups for providing the service of this package.  I believe it will certainly help to disseminate the usage of GSCA given this much easier interface.  My question is it seems the output is reported to the 3rd significant digit.  Is there an option currently to change this?

[heungsun.hwang]

Dear Wynne,

Great to hear from you! The short answer is No. We don't have that option yet and will try to add it to a next version.

Best,

Heungsun

[G Cho]

Dear Wynne,

As Heungsun said, you cannot change the number of decimal places of the results on the interface of GSCA Pro. However, you can export the results to a csv file, in which you can see the full decimal places of the results.

Best,

Gyeongcheol 

[Wynne Chin]

Hello Gyeongcheol,

Thank you for the suggestion.

It seems I’m still unable to obtain the full decimal output. I selected the export option and the csv files for both the standardized and unstandardized results were create. Unfortunately, for me, the results are still at the 3rd significant digit. 

Wynne

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GSCA Pro" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to gsca-pro+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gsca-pro/2a9387fd-33f6-442c-a74b-0acb3f81818dn%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Gyeongcheol Cho]

Hello Wynne,

Thank you for letting us know about this issue. We have not been aware that component scores in the exported csv file still have three decimal places. We will make an update that allows users to obtain component scores with 7 to 8 decimal places. It won't take long.

Best,

Gyeongcheol 

[Gyeongcheol Cho]

Hello Wynne,

We have updated our program. Now, you can obtain component scores with 15 decimal places.

Best,

Gyeongcheol

On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 2:00:33 PM UTC+9 Wynne Chin wrote: