On 17 Jul 2021, at 5:43 am, Mark Fine <mark...@gmail.com> wrote:Hi,We're running into issues with the client gRPC load balancer not re-resolving domain names to pick up added servers (12295). The workaround suggested in the issue is to set MAX_CONNECTION_AGE_MS channel arguments on the server. Is there a workaround for long-running streaming services that don't have an applicable max connection age? Our client streams run "forever" and we'd like them to pick up added servers without disrupting them. Is there anything we can do to kick the client's channel to force it to re-resolve DNS names (we're happy to handle running this periodically outside of the library). Thanks for any help!
Mark--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "grpc.io" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to grpc-io+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/CANRZ_fnd8NNG2EeqyhMn%2Beyz6QAoo5wQssqikWTnrbL%2BHyS_cQ%40mail.gmail.com.