Growl 2.01 and Bark 1.1 Crashing 10.9

[Shawn Osborne]

Hi Guys,

Growl keeps crashing everytime I try to use Bark 1.1 with OSX 10.9 Mavericks Beta 2 and Growl ver 2.01 Please Help?

I have Macbook Air 2013 8gb ram 1.3 ghz i5 512 gb ram

I have attached the growl crash log

Thank-you,

Shawn

[Christopher Forsythe]

Unfortunately we really cannot talk about 10.9 until it is released.

Chris

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to growldiscuss...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to growld...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
Chris Forsythe

@The_Tick

[Nick Christensen]

Hey, any news on this front now?

[Christopher Forsythe]

We sent information to the bark developers and they said they'd jump on it. Bark is the only thing we know of that actually crashed on 10.9.

[YR]

Hi all,

1. Growl is a great piece of software that I have been using for years: congratulations!

It has plenty of useful features, but currently (since it’s sandboxed and more limited) Growl support of Apple Notification Center is very light 

(=> all notifications are forwarded under the same name)

2. Bark plugin for Growl is great to improve Apple Notification Center support in Growl on two points:

- notifications forwarded to Notification Center keep their respective application names (since Bark is not sandboxed and limited as explained on their website),

- it’s not a global switch and therefore you can keep particular Growl styles for particular applications if you want.

=> Then, from the two above points, couldn’t there be an "official" collaboration between Growl Team and Bark Team to support (and upgrade) this plugin with the same timeline than Growl and propose it as a Growl extra,

always up-to-date like Growlnotify, on page http://growl.info/downloads

- From a practical point of view, this would avoid situation like currently when Growl is compatible with the new OS (Mavericks), but not Bark plugin.

- From a strategical point of view, I have the personal feeling that supplying and maintain over versions the best Notification Center compatibility would make Growl life longer... 

(because users would get the best: full compatibility with Apple Notification Center, with all the features brought by Growl: History, Roll-up, particular displays for particular applications, etc.)

Moreover, maybe a subtle rework of the Notification Center user interface in Growl could make this bridge between sandboxed and unsandboxed worlds more straightforward for users:

- When the user switches ON the current Growl OSX Notification support (General tab)

- Then, in spite of locking and graying the current Growl display style (Display tab), this could lock to a new "Apple Notification Center" display style, which could propose a button to download "Bark plugin" from Growl extras for users who want to get individual notification forwarding.

Is it a relevant proposal? ;-)

-Yann.

[Charlie S]

Growl 2.1.3 is waiting on approval, adds 10.9 support

About Bark on 10.9 see https://twitter.com/zwaldowski/status/394217432719826944

----

Charlie Schloss

Why Open the Web?

Despite the connecting purpose of the Web, it is not entirely open to all of its users. When used correctly, HTML documents can be displayed across platforms and devices. However, many devices are excluded access to Web content.

http://my.opera.com/community/openweb/info/

Try Opera @ http://goo.gl/h5wgi

[Yann Ricquebourg]

Hi,

Charlie S wrote on 27/10/2013

Growl 2.1.3 is waiting on approval, adds 10.9 support

Yes,
I happened to notice it from http://code.google.com/p/growl/issues/detail?id=617
that's why I anticipated that Growl now supports 10.9,� but not Bark as pointed out by Chris here
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/growldiscuss/6U4z_OtLLgA/tAqG0KTd8tcJ

About Bark on 10.9 see�https://twitter.com/zwaldowski/status/394217432719826944

Yes, that's the illustration of what I discuss in my previous message (hereafter in details).
In other words:
the task to adapt Bark to new OS + new Growl is certainly not really easy,
and that's why my proposal was to imagine that Bark could enter the "officially supported" Growl extras
=> then updating Bark could be made together with Growl Team,
which could give more chances to follow Growl timeline without period of unavailability...

Not a relevant proposal?

-Yann.

----

Charlie Schloss

Why Open the Web?

Despite the connecting purpose of the Web, it is not entirely open to all of its users. When used correctly, HTML documents can be displayed across platforms and devices. However, many devices are excluded access to Web content.

http://my.opera.com/community/openweb/info/

Try Opera @�http://goo.gl/h5wgi

On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:22 AM, YR <yann.ric...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

1. Growl is a great piece of software that I have been using for years: congratulations!

It has plenty of useful features, but currently (since it�s sandboxed and more limited) Growl support of Apple Notification Center is very light�

(=> all notifications are forwarded under the same name)

2. Bark plugin for Growl is great to improve Apple Notification Center support in Growl on two points:

- notifications forwarded to Notification Center keep their respective application names (since Bark is not sandboxed and limited as explained on their website),

- it�s not a global switch and therefore you can keep particular Growl styles for particular applications if you want.

=> Then, from the two above points, couldn�t there be an "official" collaboration between Growl Team and Bark Team to support (and upgrade) this plugin with the same timeline than Growl and propose it as a Growl extra,

always up-to-date like Growlnotify, on page http://growl.info/downloads

- From a practical point of view, this would avoid situation like currently when Growl is compatible with the new OS (Mavericks), but not Bark plugin.

- From a strategical point of view, I have the personal feeling that supplying and maintain over versions the best Notification Center compatibility would make Growl life longer...�

(because users would get the best: full compatibility with Apple Notification Center, with all the features brought by Growl: History, Roll-up, particular displays for particular applications, etc.)

Moreover, maybe a subtle rework of the Notification Center user interface in Growl could make this bridge between sandboxed and unsandboxed worlds more straightforward for users:

- When the user switches ON the current Growl OSX Notification support (General tab)

- Then, in spite of locking and graying the current Growl display style (Display tab), this could lock to a new "Apple Notification Center" display style, which could propose a button to download "Bark plugin" from Growl extras for users who want to get individual notification forwarding.

Is it a relevant proposal? ;-)

-Yann.

Le jeudi 24 octobre 2013 01:09:51 UTC+2, Christopher Forsythe a �crit�:

We sent information to the bark developers and they said they'd jump on it. Bark is the only thing we know of that actually crashed on 10.9.

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Nick Christensen <nick.g.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hey, any news on this front now?

On Sunday, July 7, 2013 4:59:42 PM UTC-6, Christopher Forsythe wrote:

Unfortunately we really cannot talk about 10.9 until it is released.

Chris

On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Shawn Osborne <thesha...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Guys,

Growl keeps crashing everytime I try to use Bark 1.1 with OSX 10.9 Mavericks Beta 2 and Growl ver 2.01 Please Help?

I have Macbook Air 2013 8gb ram 1.3 ghz i5 512 gb ram

I have attached the growl crash log

Thank-you,

Shawn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to growldiscuss...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to growld...@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

�
�

--
Chris Forsythe

@The_Tick

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to growldiscuss...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to growld...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
Chris Forsythe

@The_Tick

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to growldiscuss...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to growld...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[Charlie S]

Growl should have support with the update that is waiting on Apple to approve, & Bark you should check with the developers to see how they are with the 10.9 compatibility fixes

----

Charlie Schloss

Why Open the Web?

Despite the connecting purpose of the Web, it is not entirely open to all of its users. When used correctly, HTML documents can be displayed across platforms and devices. However, many devices are excluded access to Web content.

http://my.opera.com/community/openweb/info/

Try Opera @ http://goo.gl/h5wgi

On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Yann Ricquebourg <yann.ric...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

Charlie S wrote on 27/10/2013

Growl 2.1.3 is waiting on approval, adds 10.9 support

Yes,
I happened to notice it from http://code.google.com/p/growl/issues/detail?id=617

that's why I anticipated that Growl now supports 10.9,  but not Bark as pointed out by Chris here
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/growldiscuss/6U4z_OtLLgA/tAqG0KTd8tcJ

About Bark on 10.9 see https://twitter.com/zwaldowski/status/394217432719826944

Yes, that's the illustration of what I discuss in my previous message (hereafter in details).
In other words:
the task to adapt Bark to new OS + new Growl is certainly not really easy,
and that's why my proposal was to imagine that Bark could enter the "officially supported" Growl extras
=> then updating Bark could be made together with Growl Team,
which could give more chances to follow Growl timeline without period of unavailability...

Not a relevant proposal?

-Yann.

----

Charlie Schloss

Why Open the Web?

Despite the connecting purpose of the Web, it is not entirely open to all of its users. When used correctly, HTML documents can be displayed across platforms and devices. However, many devices are excluded access to Web content.

http://my.opera.com/community/openweb/info/

Try Opera @ http://goo.gl/h5wgi

On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:22 AM, YR <yann.ric...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi all,

1. Growl is a great piece of software that I have been using for years: congratulations!

It has plenty of useful features, but currently (since it’s sandboxed and more limited) Growl support of Apple Notification Center is very light 

(=> all notifications are forwarded under the same name)

2. Bark plugin for Growl is great to improve Apple Notification Center support in Growl on two points:

- notifications forwarded to Notification Center keep their respective application names (since Bark is not sandboxed and limited as explained on their website),

- it’s not a global switch and therefore you can keep particular Growl styles for particular applications if you want.

=> Then, from the two above points, couldn’t there be an "official" collaboration between Growl Team and Bark Team to support (and upgrade) this plugin with the same timeline than Growl and propose it as a Growl extra,

always up-to-date like Growlnotify, on page http://growl.info/downloads

- From a practical point of view, this would avoid situation like currently when Growl is compatible with the new OS (Mavericks), but not Bark plugin.

- From a strategical point of view, I have the personal feeling that supplying and maintain over versions the best Notification Center compatibility would make Growl life longer... 

(because users would get the best: full compatibility with Apple Notification Center, with all the features brought by Growl: History, Roll-up, particular displays for particular applications, etc.)

Moreover, maybe a subtle rework of the Notification Center user interface in Growl could make this bridge between sandboxed and unsandboxed worlds more straightforward for users:

- When the user switches ON the current Growl OSX Notification support (General tab)

- Then, in spite of locking and graying the current Growl display style (Display tab), this could lock to a new "Apple Notification Center" display style, which could propose a button to download "Bark plugin" from Growl extras for users who want to get individual notification forwarding.

Is it a relevant proposal? ;-)

-Yann.

Le jeudi 24 octobre 2013 01:09:51 UTC+2, Christopher Forsythe a écrit :

We sent information to the bark developers and they said they'd jump on it. Bark is the only thing we know of that actually crashed on 10.9.

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Nick Christensen <nick.g.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hey, any news on this front now?

On Sunday, July 7, 2013 4:59:42 PM UTC-6, Christopher Forsythe wrote:

Unfortunately we really cannot talk about 10.9 until it is released.

Chris

On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Shawn Osborne <thesha...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Guys,

Growl keeps crashing everytime I try to use Bark 1.1 with OSX 10.9 Mavericks Beta 2 and Growl ver 2.01 Please Help?

I have Macbook Air 2013 8gb ram 1.3 ghz i5 512 gb ram

I have attached the growl crash log

Thank-you,

Shawn

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to growldiscuss...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to growld...@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 

--
Chris Forsythe

@The_Tick

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to growldiscuss...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to growld...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
Chris Forsythe

@The_Tick

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to growldiscuss...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to growld...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to growldiscuss...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to growld...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.