Stefan,
Permitting is an barrier. There are a lot of things we can do about obstacles. I have been astounded more than once at how political we must become to reclaim our right to take back such a basic right as local food production. Here I am in a town of 300 and I can't have chickens--but a person in south Minneapolis can! Permitting laws and building codes are rules made by people and people can change the rules when we have the political will. Sometimes we have to raise awareness before we can raise structures.
When a greenhouse like mine is built as part of a community project or a school, it gives more people the opportunity to rethink things like building codes and permits. It gives those involved practical, valuable experience they can take with them wherever they go to pursue their own dreams. That's one of the services Growing Power provides and is doing it on a national level, bless their hard working hearts.
Here's how I look at barriers. I was told when I began my journey that what I wanted to do couldn't be done. It wouldn't work, it would cost too much, blah blah blah. Rather than being dissuaded by these expert opinions, I used them as identifiers of the challenges I would need to overcome. Why won't it work? Why would it cost too much? Are there solutions to those answers and are they deal killers for me or not? Every innovator faces this test. Will the reasons why it can't be done be a self-fulfilling prophecy for defeat or a chance to stretch those creative problem-solving skills we clever, adaptive humans possess? The only marvel about the Garden Goddess greenhouse is that we didn't let the nay sayers stop us from actualizing a dream. The rest was just practical application of sound research.
I'm not saying a passive solar greenhouse is everybody's solution because each person on this list has unique values, goals and skill sets they bring to the growing-under-cover scene. For some, low hoops and cold frames get them where they want to go. We start at that end of the continuum and go all the way to the passive solar greenhouse. No single solution has any higher merit than another because they all address different pieces of the season extension puzzle and come with their own challenges.
I just don't want to see any part of that puzzle removed because "it can't be done." It might take longer than we like and involve working for change to get to the point where we can implement these solutions but that does not invalidate their place in the conversation or the research efforts. While some have to struggle with their local officials, others can experiment with the best hoop design and construction to maximize production in winter. We all gain from both efforts. I'm not giving up on having chickens someday and what a wealth of information I'll have available from the back yard coop group of the twin cities!
You are right about the need to look at the economy of scale any grower currently has. I'm keenly aware of that because I dance upon the fence of still needing a full time job (and its benefits) and wanting to expand my own produce business. I'm not alone in this dilemma. There's always the option to consider that a group can pool resources and talents to move forward together. That model contains its own challenges and rewards that do not suit everyone, but it does provide the collective ability to take on challenges that seem daunting to an individual.
There are organizations in our state that are committed to supporting small and beginning farmers whether in rural or urban locations. They can put their energy into helping us. And the media loves a good struggle story. Public awareness is important for our pursuits. Putting the face on the farmer is what it's all about and we've had good evidence of the positive effects of the news coverage that follows the fight against outdated local permit policies in our region. That battle can be won by people unwilling to accept status quo.
There's lots of clever and meaningful quotes out there which speak to the power of grass roots change, but it's not a fight everyone is able and willing to take on. I get that. Notice that I haven't butted heads with my own city council about chickens yet because they oddly seem far more opposed to small scale livestock in town (a town that's about 5 blocks square and surrounded by agriculture, by the way) as opposed to lax building codes. Sense?!? Who said this stuff had to make sense?!?
As to your comments about managing compost materials, Stefan, I am excited about that challenge for urban farmers, the true modern pioneers in uncharted territory. We are going to come up with wonderful, creative solutions to these questions of how to access and manage soil fertility components. This is the undramatic but profound revolution. Talk about your grass roots movements, people! Wow! Will we be jailed for harboring animal waste? Will we march to have the right to construct hoophouses on empty lots? It's a fundamentally worthwhile political action when people recreate their basic right to feed themselves and their neighbors without unneccessary (key work there, debatable, I realize) government intervention.
I hope I get to stick around for the next 20 years and see how far we take this. It's the legacy we can be proud of, as opposed to the fallout of wars and national debt and health care bondoogles. Let us lift our hoes and dig! Unfurl the floating row covers of the revolution! I am proud to feed 18 families with my part time labor and ingenuity and I am proud to be a very small part of a very good thing. And I am grateful to every person who brings her/his talent to this marvelous campaign to reclaim the goodness of local food production. Grow on!
Oh my goodness how did I get on such a roll today? What was in that Fair Share coffee this morning? Something spicy. It's working for me.
Carol