Evaluation Criteria for an On-line Course

[Vedran]

Author(s): liyan Yordanov, Vedran Fak

A. List of evaluation criteria

[1.] system is user-friendly, certain level of intuitiveness
[2.] introduction to the course available and training in accessing
and navigating the course provided
[3.] detailed course syllabus presented no later than at the first
class
[4.] attractive materials provided
[5.] material presented logically and easy for students to move around
[6.] easy communication flow between different roles as well as
content assured
[7.] feedback available
[8.] social software used
[9.] consistency of navigation, course structure, and layout available
[10.] hyperlinks used sparingly and with reason, used in compliance
with course objectives
[11.] multimedia, animation, links used in compliance with course
objectives
[12.] limit (reasonable) amount of text provided
[13.] clear activities defined
[14.] measurable objectives defined
[15.] clear roles and responsibilities defined
[16.] assignments favour self-directed learning provided
[17.] obligatory and additional resources provided
[18.] testing and assessment module/part existed
[19.] personalization and customization assured
[20.] technical help and support provided


B. Non-numeric scale to be applied for evaluation of each one of the
criteria

1 point: do not agree

2 points: to some extent agree

3 points: agree

4 points: to a great extent agree

5 points: strongly agree


C. Scoring, Analysis and Conclusion

(86-100 points)
Excellent - outstanding performance with only minor errors (90%-100%)

(66-85 points)
Very good - above the average standard but with some errors (65%-90%)

(50-65 points)
Good - generally good work with a number of notable errors (35%-65%)

(31-49 points)
Satisfactory - fair but with significant shortcomings (10%-35%)

(10-30 points)
Fail - considerable work required before the credit can be awarded


PLEASE COMMENT

Thank you

[Korneliya]

it sounds goog
we can use :

List of evaluation criteria are used in design of course roster and
they can be used to check the quality of our course in peer review and
formative evaluation

Non-numeric scale to be applied for evaluation of each one of the

criteria to create a feedback form that should be used from our
students to give their opinion about the quality and effectiveness of
the course

Scoring, Analysis and Conclusion can be include as a description of
assessment of our students

[Vedran]

Thank you Korneliya.

I would ask the others to comment now. This has to be done asap, so,
the sooner you all comment, the sooner i can make the summary and the
sooner this responsibility will be over :)

If you agree with everything here and have nothing to comment just
write a reply saying that "I have nothing to add, i agree with
everything", so i don't wait for comments and lose precious time.

Thanks

[Iliyan Yordanov]

hi to all of you
i agree with vedran
first i publishe dit as a file (incl. discussion topic as well)
second vedran published as a discussion
by no we do not have anything to add, comment etc
dear all, please give your ideas by the end of tomorrow otherwise it
will be assumed as a final version in order to progress the group
tasks
and i will published it with a watermark final
thanks in advance, iliyan

On Apr 21, 8:40 pm, Vedran <Vedran....@gmail.com> wrote:

[Anu]

Sounds very good, I have nothing to add.:)

[Szymon Waliczek]

I think that this criteria is so good... I don't know what i can add...

But I've a question: the student gets a points. If he gets  a one point  with each criteria, he will have the least 20 points, not 10. If I think good, I'll change a ranges.
For example:
(86-100 points) (95-100)

Excellent - outstanding performance with only minor errors (90%-100%)

(66-85 points) (76-94)

Very good - above the average standard but with some errors (65%-90%)

(50-65 points) (60-75)

Good - generally good work with a number of notable errors (35%-65%)

(31-49 points) (40-59)

Satisfactory - fair but with significant shortcomings (10%-35%)

(10-30 points) (20-40)

Fail - considerable work required before the credit can be awarded

The numbers we'll be able change...

[Iliyan Yordanov]

Yes, I agree of course – starts from 20 onwards

I will implement it later into the document’s final version when everybody say ok

Thank szymon

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Iliyan Yordanov / Илиян Йорданов

 

=================================================
Съдържанието на това съобщение е лично и поверително.
Ако сте го получили погрешка, моля уведомете незабавно
изпращача и го изтрийте от системата си.

 

The content of this message is personal and confidential. If
you have received it by mistake, please immediately notify
the sender and delete it from your system.
=================================================

[Iliyan Yordanov]

final version of the document describing the evaluation criteria for
our on-line course is here:

http://groups.google.com/group/group6ib/web/online_course_evaluation_citeria_final_2008-04-25.pdf

and

http://htk.tlu.ee/elearning/iliyanyordanov/files/2008/04/online_course_evaluation_citeria_final_2008-04-25.pdf

On Apr 21, 8:40 pm, Vedran <Vedran....@gmail.com> wrote: